[d-kernel] q: 2.6.24 unlucky?

[d-kernel] q: 2.6.24 unlucky?

[Michael Shigorin]

	Здравствуйте.
---
The 2.6.25.3 stable kernel has been released. It was a bit
earlier than expected due to "two security bugs fixed in here
that just recently were made public". The release note is not
clear which of the updates are the security fixes, but "all users
of the 2.6.25 series are strongly encouraged to upgrade, and
anyone running 2.6.24 should also move up to 2.6.25 at this time
if possible." Click below for more details.
--- http://lwn.net/Articles/281689

Могу быть неправ, но что-то кажется, что .24 -- "неудачное"...
ovz-шники его так и не довели до ума, все остальные тоже скорее
проскипали.

-- 
 ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <mike@altlinux.ru>
  ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/

Re: [d-kernel] q: 2.6.24 unlucky?

[Konstantin A. Lepikhov]

Hi Michael!

Saturday 10, at 11:19:54 PM you wrote:

> 	Здравствуйте.
> ---
> The 2.6.25.3 stable kernel has been released. It was a bit
> earlier than expected due to "two security bugs fixed in here
> that just recently were made public". The release note is not
> clear which of the updates are the security fixes, but "all users
> of the 2.6.25 series are strongly encouraged to upgrade, and
> anyone running 2.6.24 should also move up to 2.6.25 at this time
> if possible." Click below for more details.
> --- http://lwn.net/Articles/281689
> 
> Могу быть неправ, но что-то кажется, что .24 -- "неудачное"...
> ovz-шники его так и не довели до ума, все остальные тоже скорее
> проскипали.
ovz'чики будут его пилить, пока жив hardy.

-- 
WBR et al.

Re: [d-kernel] q: 2.6.24 unlucky?

[Dmitry V. Levin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 983 bytes --]

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 01:10:19AM +0400, Konstantin A. Lepikhov wrote:
> Saturday 10, at 11:19:54 PM you wrote:
> 
> > 	Здравствуйте.
> > ---
> > The 2.6.25.3 stable kernel has been released. It was a bit
> > earlier than expected due to "two security bugs fixed in here
> > that just recently were made public". The release note is not
> > clear which of the updates are the security fixes, but "all users
> > of the 2.6.25 series are strongly encouraged to upgrade, and
> > anyone running 2.6.24 should also move up to 2.6.25 at this time
> > if possible." Click below for more details.
> > --- http://lwn.net/Articles/281689
> > 
> > Могу быть неправ, но что-то кажется, что .24 -- "неудачное"...
> > ovz-шники его так и не довели до ума, все остальные тоже скорее
> > проскипали.
> ovz'чики будут его пилить, пока жив hardy.

Нечто подобное я от них слышал ещё осенью.
Может быть, у тебя есть ссылка на свежее подтверждение этого утверждения?


-- 
ldv

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [d-kernel] q: 2.6.24 unlucky?

[Konstantin A. Lepikhov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1258 bytes --]

Hi Dmitry!

Sunday 11, at 01:21:41 AM you wrote:

> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 01:10:19AM +0400, Konstantin A. Lepikhov wrote:
> > Saturday 10, at 11:19:54 PM you wrote:
> > 
> > > 	Здравствуйте.
> > > ---
> > > The 2.6.25.3 stable kernel has been released. It was a bit
> > > earlier than expected due to "two security bugs fixed in here
> > > that just recently were made public". The release note is not
> > > clear which of the updates are the security fixes, but "all users
> > > of the 2.6.25 series are strongly encouraged to upgrade, and
> > > anyone running 2.6.24 should also move up to 2.6.25 at this time
> > > if possible." Click below for more details.
> > > --- http://lwn.net/Articles/281689
> > > 
> > > Могу быть неправ, но что-то кажется, что .24 -- "неудачное"...
> > > ovz-шники его так и не довели до ума, все остальные тоже скорее
> > > проскипали.
> > ovz'чики будут его пилить, пока жив hardy.
> 
> Нечто подобное я от них слышал ещё осенью.
> Может быть, у тебя есть ссылка на свежее подтверждение этого утверждения?
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-hardy.git;a=commit;h=093579b35541f6a3a3ecfebf6f224ff336846d56
и далее по тексту.

+ http://wiki.openvz.org/Ubuntu_Hardy_TODO

-- 
WBR et al.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]