From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 01:10:19 +0400 From: "Konstantin A. Lepikhov" To: shigorin@gmail.com, ALT Linux kernel packages development Message-ID: <20080510211019.GA26957@lks.home> Mail-Followup-To: shigorin@gmail.com, ALT Linux kernel packages development References: <20080510201954.GC22262@osdn.org.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080510201954.GC22262@osdn.org.ua> X-Operation-System: ALT Linux Sisyphus (20071221) 2.6.26-wks-pae-alt0.1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: Re: [d-kernel] q: 2.6.24 unlucky? X-BeenThere: devel-kernel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux kernel packages development List-Id: ALT Linux kernel packages development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 21:10:31 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hi Michael! Saturday 10, at 11:19:54 PM you wrote: > Здравствуйте. > --- > The 2.6.25.3 stable kernel has been released. It was a bit > earlier than expected due to "two security bugs fixed in here > that just recently were made public". The release note is not > clear which of the updates are the security fixes, but "all users > of the 2.6.25 series are strongly encouraged to upgrade, and > anyone running 2.6.24 should also move up to 2.6.25 at this time > if possible." Click below for more details. > --- http://lwn.net/Articles/281689 > > Могу быть неправ, но что-то кажется, что .24 -- "неудачное"... > ovz-шники его так и не довели до ума, все остальные тоже скорее > проскипали. ovz'чики будут его пилить, пока жив hardy. -- WBR et al.