From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org> Subject: Re: [devel] forced noarch Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:33:37 +0200 Message-ID: <cc557aab0912231233se10cecdr4ed91ba815df41ba@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20091223191938.GZ9864@altlinux.org> 2009/12/23 Alexey Tourbin <at@altlinux.ru>: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 04:17:09PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >> 2009/12/22 Alexey Tourbin <at@altlinux.ru>: >> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:18:49PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:05:56AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> > http://git.altlinux.org/people/at/packages/girar-builder.git >> >> > 642af655 gb-task-check-noarch-i: force noarch by extensional equality >> >> [...] >> >> > 3) Cannot make arch package with identical files and deps. >> >> > E.g. cannot make arch perl module which should be noarch. >> >> > >> >> > [at@people 17774]$ PATH=~/git.alt/girar-builder:$PATH gb-task-check-noarch-i 5 >> >> > error (#5): perl-Net-IP-1.25-alt2.i586.rpm should be noarch >> >> >> >> This restriction looks too hard. How many packages in current >> >> repository would fail to pass the check? >> > >> > Why do you think it's too hard? Basically, it says "if the list >> > of files is the same, and ***md5 sums*** are identical, and deps >> > are identical, the package must be noarch then". >> >> I don't think that it's a good idea. >> >> There are only two architectures in Sisyphus - i586 and x86_64, >> which are similar. It's not enough to be sure, that package is >> really noarch. > > Can you specify a package (from the list) which is identical on i586 > and x86_64, but should not be made noarch because it assumes e.g. > little-endian architecture? At least all packages which contain GNU message catalog files(*.mo): $ for p in `cat ~/tmp/force-noarch`; do rpm -qpl $p | grep -q '^/usr/share/locale/.*\.mo' && echo $p ; done bison-runtime-2.4.1-alt2.i586.rpm celestia-common-1.6.0-alt4.i586.rpm comix-4.0.4-alt1.1.i586.rpm gftp-common-2.0.18stable-alt5.i586.rpm gkrellm-ss-common-2.6-alt1.i586.rpm gnome-utils-common-2.28.1-alt2.i586.rpm gramps-3.1.2-alt1.1.i586.rpm gwenview-i18n-1.4.2-alt1.i586.rpm installer-ltsp-0.1-alt2.5.7.i586.rpm installer-ltsp-school-0.4-alt5.3.i586.rpm installer-server-0.2-alt2.i586.rpm installer-server-lite-0.2-alt1.i586.rpm libgtk-engines-default-common-2.18.4-alt1.i586.rpm remount_rw-0.2-alt1.i586.rpm sugar-pippy-activity-25-alt3.1.i586.rpm virt-manager-0.8.2-alt2.i586.rpm Who knows what else. >> I think we should postpone the idea untill Sisyphus will have at >> least one non-x86 arch and one big-endian arch. > > i586 and x86_64 are "different enough" except for endianness. > Look how they are different: > 1) file paths are different (lib - lib64); > 2) native binaries are different (elf32 - elf64); > 3) sizeof(void*) == sizeof(long) is different. > > How they are common: > 1) sizeof(int) is the same (32 bit), > 2) both are little endian. > Which means that certain host data structures (and thus certain binary > file formats) might have the same representation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-23 20:33 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2009-12-21 23:36 ` [devel] noarch and /usr/share (packages/aptitude: tags/0.4.5-alt5) Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-22 8:05 ` Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-22 12:12 ` Michael Shigorin 2009-12-22 17:57 ` Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-23 12:00 ` Michael Shigorin 2009-12-23 18:48 ` Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-22 18:18 ` [devel] forced noarch Dmitry V. Levin 2009-12-22 18:54 ` Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-22 19:02 ` Damir Shayhutdinov 2009-12-22 19:06 ` Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-23 14:17 ` Kirill A. Shutemov 2009-12-23 19:19 ` Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-23 20:33 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message] 2009-12-23 21:23 ` Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-23 0:49 ` [devel] packages with non-identical /usr/share Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-23 11:57 ` Michael Shigorin 2009-12-23 2:11 ` [devel] forced noarch Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-23 11:12 ` Dmitry V. Levin 2009-12-23 12:38 ` Damir Shayhutdinov 2009-12-23 12:47 ` Michael Shigorin 2009-12-23 13:11 ` Dmitry V. Levin 2009-12-23 13:17 ` Damir Shayhutdinov 2009-12-23 13:52 ` Dmitry V. Levin 2009-12-23 20:11 ` Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-23 22:30 ` Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-24 0:26 ` Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-27 1:09 ` [devel] forcing arch/noarch Dmitry V. Levin 2009-12-27 1:53 ` Alexey Tourbin 2009-12-27 9:50 ` Денис Смирнов 2009-12-28 0:44 ` Dmitry V. Levin 2009-12-28 17:23 ` [devel] suggesting arch/noarch Michael Shigorin 2009-12-29 0:47 ` Alexey Tourbin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=cc557aab0912231233se10cecdr4ed91ba815df41ba@mail.gmail.com \ --to=kirill@shutemov.name \ --cc=devel@lists.altlinux.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
ALT Linux Team development discussions This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/0 devel/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 devel devel/ http://lore.altlinux.org/devel \ devel@altlinux.org devel@altlinux.ru devel@lists.altlinux.org devel@lists.altlinux.ru devel@linux.iplabs.ru mandrake-russian@linuxteam.iplabs.ru sisyphus@linuxteam.iplabs.ru public-inbox-index devel Example config snippet for mirrors. Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://lore.altlinux.org/org.altlinux.lists.devel AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git