[devel] [Fwd: Re: [Trac] Trac 0.9.3 and Subversion 1.3.0 -- anyone done this yet?]

[devel] [Fwd: Re: [Trac] Trac 0.9.3 and Subversion 1.3.0 -- anyone done this yet?]

[Vitaly Ostanin]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 166 bytes --]

Здравствуйте.

На тему совместимости subversion 1.3.0 и Trac.

-- 
Regards, Vyt
mailto:  vyt@vzljot.ru
JID:     vyt@vzljot.ru

[-- Attachment #1.2: Re: [Trac] Trac 0.9.3 and Subversion 1.3.0 -- anyone done this yet? --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 4804 bytes --]

From: Christian Boos <cboos@neuf.fr>
To: trac@lists.edgewall.com
Subject: Re: [Trac] Trac 0.9.3 and Subversion 1.3.0 -- anyone done this yet?
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:49:19 +0100
Message-ID: <43CE637F.9060207@neuf.fr>

Sean Hussey wrote:
> All is well with 0.9.2 and 1.3.0.  We haven't upgraded Trac yet.
>   

There are currently two tickets opened for Trac concerning the 
Subversion bindings for 1.3.0:
 * #2472, which has a patch for the bindings themselves;
    That patch will most probably be part of 1.3.1.
 * #2611, which seems to happen in combination with mod_python,
    and is still not solved (it's an intermittent problem, related to 
threading)

-- Christian

> On 1/18/06, Dave Truckenmiller <dave.truckenmiller@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Has anyone tried Trac 0.9.3 and Subversion 1.3.0 yet?  I've upgraded
>> to Trac 0.9.3 and want to upgrade Subversion (from 1.2.3), but I don't
>> want to be the first.  :-)
>>
>>
>> --
>> dave.truckenmiller@gmail.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Trac mailing list
>> Trac@lists.edgewall.com
>> http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Trac mailing list
> Trac@lists.edgewall.com
> http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Trac mailing list
Trac@lists.edgewall.com
http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]