[devel] acl file missing: a trouble for repocop

[devel] acl file missing: a trouble for repocop

[Igor Vlasenko]

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 07:18:47PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Subject: [#874] COMPLETE sisyphus_check.git=0.8.9-alt1
обновил, запустил,

и кстати вытоптал грабли:
can't open acl file /home/repocop/Sisyphus/files/list/list.src.classic: No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/Test/Repocop/ALTLinuxACL.pm line

где теперь можно найти файл текущих acl в виде,
дружествнном к роботу?

-- 

Dr. Igor Vlasenko
--------------------
Topology Department
Institute of Math
Kiev, Ukraine

Re: [devel] acl file missing: a trouble for repocop

[Mikhail Gusarov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 308 bytes --]


Twas brillig at 20:55:38 14.02.2009 UTC+02 when vlasenko@imath.kiev.ua did gyre and gimble:

 IV> где теперь можно найти файл текущих acl в виде,
 IV> дружествнном к роботу?

rsync://git.altlinux.org/acl или http://git.altlinux.org/acl

-- 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 196 bytes --]

Re: [devel] acl file missing: a trouble for repocop

[Alexey Tourbin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 618 bytes --]

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:55:38PM +0200, Igor Vlasenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 07:18:47PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > Subject: [#874] COMPLETE sisyphus_check.git=0.8.9-alt1
> обновил, запустил,
> 
> и кстати вытоптал грабли:
> can't open acl file /home/repocop/Sisyphus/files/list/list.src.classic: No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/Test/Repocop/ALTLinuxACL.pm line
> 
> где теперь можно найти файл текущих acl в виде,
> дружествнном к роботу?

What kind of tests have to deal with ACL, and why do you think
that ACL thing is important for automated post-processing?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [devel] acl file missing: a trouble for repocop

[Igor Vlasenko]

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 02:13:18AM +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> 
> Twas brillig at 20:55:38 14.02.2009 UTC+02 when vlasenko@imath.kiev.ua did gyre and gimble:
> 
>  IV> где теперь можно найти файл текущих acl в виде,
>  IV> дружествнном к роботу?
> 
> rsync://git.altlinux.org/acl или http://git.altlinux.org/acl

просёк.

-- 

Dr. Igor Vlasenko
--------------------
Topology Department
Institute of Math
Kiev, Ukraine

Re: [devel] acl file missing: a trouble for repocop

[Igor Vlasenko]

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:23:04PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:55:38PM +0200, Igor Vlasenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 07:18:47PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > Subject: [#874] COMPLETE sisyphus_check.git=0.8.9-alt1
> > обновил, запустил,
> > 
> > и кстати вытоптал грабли:
> > can't open acl file /home/repocop/Sisyphus/files/list/list.src.classic: No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/Test/Repocop/ALTLinuxACL.pm line
> > 
> > где теперь можно найти файл текущих acl в виде,
> > дружествнном к роботу?
> 
> What kind of tests have to deal with ACL, and why do you think
> that ACL thing is important for automated post-processing?

отчеты по тестам. С разбивкой согласно acl.


-- 

Dr. Igor Vlasenko
--------------------
Topology Department
Institute of Math
Kiev, Ukraine

Re: [devel] acl file missing: a trouble for repocop

[Alexey Tourbin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1382 bytes --]

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:04:58PM +0200, Igor Vlasenko wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:23:04PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:55:38PM +0200, Igor Vlasenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 07:18:47PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > > Subject: [#874] COMPLETE sisyphus_check.git=0.8.9-alt1
> > > обновил, запустил,
> > > 
> > > и кстати вытоптал грабли:
> > > can't open acl file /home/repocop/Sisyphus/files/list/list.src.classic: No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/Test/Repocop/ALTLinuxACL.pm line
> > > 
> > > где теперь можно найти файл текущих acl в виде,
> > > дружествнном к роботу?
> > 
> > What kind of tests have to deal with ACL, and why do you think
> > that ACL thing is important for automated post-processing?
> 
> отчеты по тестам. С разбивкой согласно acl.

Some time ago, the only possibility for testing was post-processing.
Recently, things have changed.  Now there's a (still rather limited)
possibility for pre-processing, PROVIDED that your checks can detect
important issues and PROVIDED your code does not take too much time.

That is to say, there's a real shift.  Something can be a pre-condition,
not a post-condition as it used to be.

Here is a clue: think of how you can integrate certain parts of your
code directly into girar-builder.  This is not impossible.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [devel] acl file missing: a trouble for repocop

[Dmitry V. Levin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1649 bytes --]

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 12:22:54AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:04:58PM +0200, Igor Vlasenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:23:04PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 08:55:38PM +0200, Igor Vlasenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 07:18:47PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > > > Subject: [#874] COMPLETE sisyphus_check.git=0.8.9-alt1
> > > > обновил, запустил,
> > > > 
> > > > и кстати вытоптал грабли:
> > > > can't open acl file /home/repocop/Sisyphus/files/list/list.src.classic: No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/Test/Repocop/ALTLinuxACL.pm line
> > > > 
> > > > где теперь можно найти файл текущих acl в виде,
> > > > дружествнном к роботу?
> > > 
> > > What kind of tests have to deal with ACL, and why do you think
> > > that ACL thing is important for automated post-processing?
> > 
> > отчеты по тестам. С разбивкой согласно acl.
> 
> Some time ago, the only possibility for testing was post-processing.
> Recently, things have changed.  Now there's a (still rather limited)
> possibility for pre-processing, PROVIDED that your checks can detect
> important issues and PROVIDED your code does not take too much time.
> 
> That is to say, there's a real shift.  Something can be a pre-condition,
> not a post-condition as it used to be.
> 
> Here is a clue: think of how you can integrate certain parts of your
> code directly into girar-builder.  This is not impossible.

Strictly speaking, there is a little pre-processing tool we use
for a long time already: sisyphus_check.  All the rest is true.


-- 
ldv

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [devel] acl file missing: a trouble for repocop

[Igor Vlasenko]

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 12:22:54AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> Some time ago, the only possibility for testing was post-processing.
> Recently, things have changed.  Now there's a (still rather limited)
> possibility for pre-processing, PROVIDED that your checks can detect
> important issues and PROVIDED your code does not take too much time.
> 
> That is to say, there's a real shift.  Something can be a pre-condition,
> not a post-condition as it used to be.
> 
> Here is a clue: think of how you can integrate certain parts of your
> code directly into girar-builder.  This is not impossible.

Dmitry already did it well.
http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/xxx/plan/ has a list of added/removed packages.
http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/xxx/build/? has new packages themselves.

The only thing left in girar that we need for integration is a passive notifier, 
i.e. some kind of robot-friendly list of successively completed tasks.

I think it is preferred and unix-way.

I think any kind of active notifier (some script that runs after a task
has completed and either tries to launch repocop directly or tries to 
send it a message) will add an extra complexity to girar builder 
and will make both of them less scalable and maintainable.

repocop is 90% ready to work in the described mode, 
exept the patch generator which still need some imnprovement.

-- 

Dr. Igor Vlasenko
--------------------
Topology Department
Institute of Math
Kiev, Ukraine