[devel] Re: PDL (was: Sisyphus 20041228 rebuild status)

[Alexey Tourbin <at@altlinux.ru>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1405 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:48:27PM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 02:44:03PM +0300, QA Team Robot wrote:
> > package perl-PDL-1:2.4.1-alt1 looks orphaned [12] (Alexey Tourbin).
> 
> С PDL всё странно.  Собираю новую версию, и как всегда: шаг влево, шаг
> вправо -- segmentation fault.  Пусть пока будет как есть.  Пока не
> прояснится... на доске... :)

И однако же посылают.
Часовые пояса у нас разные.


----- Forwarded message from Alexey Tourbin <at@altlinux ru> -----

Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 22:04:41 +0300
From: Alexey Tourbin <at@altlinux ru>
Subject: Re: PDL-P: Re: PDL-2.4.2 and Test::More 0.53, segfaults
To: Craig DeForest <deforest@boulder.swri edu>
Cc: perldl-porters@jach.hawaii edu
Message-ID: <20041229190440.GA23159@solemn.turbinal org>

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 11:43:08AM -0700, Craig DeForest wrote:
> PDL-2.4.2 passes all tests on my system (perl 5.8.5, no ithreads, Test::More
> version 0.47).

Yes, this is apparently so.  As recent Test::More releases are not quite
wide-spread, portability issues can be laid aside until the next PDL
release.

However, my new test, t/segfault.t, has nothing in common with
portability issues: it simply demonstrates a segmentation fault, the
thing that normally should never happen.

I should have started a different thread (or maybe file a bug).


----- End forwarded message -----


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]