From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 From: Vitaly Kuznetsov To: ALT Linux sysadmins' discussion References: <4C717053.4080901@rambler.ru> <201008261007.15033.kde@kde.kiev.ua> <8739u1ajlp.fsf@vps2.branbackup.org> <201008261105.48939.kde@kde.kiev.ua> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:52:43 +0000 In-Reply-To: <201008261105.48939.kde@kde.kiev.ua> (Denis Kuznetsov's message of "Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:05:48 +0300") Message-ID: <87pqx58zv8.fsf@vps2.branbackup.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Sysadmins] =?utf-8?b?0JLQuNGA0YLRg9Cw0LvQuNC30LDRhtC40Y8=?= X-BeenThere: sysadmins@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux sysadmins' discussion List-Id: ALT Linux sysadmins' discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:52:55 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: Denis Kuznetsov writes: > On Thursday 26 August 2010 11:01:06 Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> Вы, вероятно, что-то себе неверно представляете по поводу ocfs2 в том >> смысле, что отличий от gfs там немного (с пользовательской точки зрения). >> ocfs2 поверх drbd позволяет смонтировать одну и ту же fs на двух узлах >> на запись. > А разве ocfs2 не позволяет хранить одни и теже данные на 2-х и более > нодах не прибегая к использованию drbd ? Two popular designs in this class of file systems are distributed parallel (LUSTRE) and shared disk (OCFS2, GFS2). ... Shared disk file systems, on the other hand, scale to 100+ nodes. As the name suggests, such file systems require a shared disk (SAN). All server nodes in the cluster must be able to perform I/O directly and concurrently to the disk. -- Vitaly Kuznetsov, ALT Linux