From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 From: Vitaly Kuznetsov To: ALT Linux sysadmins' discussion References: <4C717053.4080901@rambler.ru> <4C73F329.7080305@rambler.ru> <874oekdl9q.fsf@vps2.branbackup.org> <4C740351.4010601@rambler.ru> <87iq2zdi1t.fsf@vps2.branbackup.org> <87vd6zb17m.fsf_-_@vps2.branbackup.org> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:40:21 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Anton Farygin's message of "Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:38:32 +0400") Message-ID: <87mxsbb0nu.fsf@vps2.branbackup.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Sysadmins] XEN benchmark X-BeenThere: sysadmins@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux sysadmins' discussion List-Id: ALT Linux sysadmins' discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:40:35 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: Anton Farygin writes: > для userspace - по идее да. Если не смержены, то я посмотрю, что > отличается. > > Меня больше беспокоит ядро в плане kvm, а не userspace. Можно использовать el-smp. Я попробую прогнать тот же тест. -- Vitaly Kuznetsov, ALT Linux