From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FUZZY_XPILL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 22:05:39 +0200 From: Michael Shigorin To: ALT Linux sysadmins' discussion Message-ID: <20140204200539.GC2275@osdn.org.ua> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Linux sysadmins' discussion References: <20140203202107.GA2275@osdn.org.ua> <52F0A67A.1030107@altlinux.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <52F0A67A.1030107@altlinux.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: [Sysadmins] compare lvm on mdadm vs lvm-raid X-BeenThere: sysadmins@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: mike@altlinux.org, ALT Linux sysadmins' discussion List-Id: ALT Linux sysadmins' discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 20:05:44 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 12:36:10PM +0400, Anton Gorlov wrote: > >Не трать время, там всё действительно плохо с тех пор, > >как апстрим mdadm добавил --incremental в udev rule. > А чем плохо --incremental ? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReliableRaid -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin / http://altlinux.org ------ http://opennet.ru / http://anna-news.info