From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:34:21 +0200 From: Michael Shigorin To: ALT Linux sysadmin discuss Message-ID: <20110219103421.GD29734@osdn.org.ua> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Linux sysadmin discuss References: <4D5CEE53.8050309@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4D5CEE53.8050309@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: [Sysadmins] truecrypt vs cryptsetup X-BeenThere: sysadmins@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: shigorin@gmail.com, ALT Linux sysadmins' discussion List-Id: ALT Linux sysadmins' discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:17:46 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:45:55PM +0300, Anton A. Vinogradov wrote: > Из минусов truecrypt -- отсутствие в репозитории. Там ещё с лицензированием какие-то маловнятные штуки были. Кажется, как раз около 5.0. -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/