From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: sysadmins@lists.altlinux.org From: Grigory Batalov Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 09:25:54 +0400 Organization: ALT Linux Team Message-ID: <20070503092554.269f1afc.bga@altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.19.240.20 X-Newsreader: Sylpheed version 0.9.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-alt-linux-gnu) Sender: news Subject: [Sysadmins] dspam vs. spamassassin? X-BeenThere: sysadmins@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9rc1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux sysadmin discuss List-Id: ALT Linux sysadmin discuss List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 05:26:27 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: Здравствуйте! Чем нынче удобнее/надёжнее пользоваться для фильтрации спама на сервере: dspam или spamassassin? Кто что думает? Интересно также сочетание с Postfix mailfromd, postgrey, sqlgrey. -- Grigory Batalov, ALT Linux Team