From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 From: Gennady Kovalev To: ALT Linux sysadmin discuss In-Reply-To: <494BDD5A.50507@diyaorg.dp.ua> References: <494BB7DA.3090103@diyaorg.dp.ua> <494BDD5A.50507@diyaorg.dp.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: BIGUR Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:49:42 +0300 Message-Id: <1229806182.12874.1.camel@kata> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 (2.24.2-alt1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Sysadmins] =?koi8-r?b?T3BlblZaIG5tYiDXztXU0skgVlBTLg==?= X-BeenThere: sysadmins@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux sysadmin discuss List-Id: ALT Linux sysadmin discuss List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:49:54 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: В Птн, 19/12/2008 в 19:43 +0200, Roman Savochenko пишет: > > точно veth в bridge с eth0 ? > > > Точно: > [root@serverN ~]# brctl show > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > br1 8000.001851b33792 no eth0 > > veth1.0 Может письмо отформатировалось не так? На всякий случай еще раз, veth1.0 в бридже? > А чем бы прохождение широковещательных запросов на сервер наглядно > проверить? tcpdump -i eth0 -nn host -- Gennady Kovalev BIGUR