From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mics.msu.su From: Peter Volkov To: ALT Linux sysadmin discuss In-Reply-To: <200711081929.41870.skompan@kspu.kr.ua> References: <200711081929.41870.skompan@kspu.kr.ua> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jj9X0DuiWBPWyEOiykC1" Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:32:44 +0300 Message-Id: <1194784364.10023.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Subject: Re: [Sysadmins] GRE: Bad checksum from pppd X-BeenThere: sysadmins@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux sysadmin discuss List-Id: ALT Linux sysadmin discuss List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 12:32:46 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: --=-jj9X0DuiWBPWyEOiykC1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =D0=92 =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 08/11/2007 =D0=B2 19:29 +0200, Serge =D0=BF=D0= =B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > =D0=B2 =D0=BB=D0=BE=D0=B3=D0=B0=D1=85 =D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B8 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0= =B4=D0=BA=D0=BB=D1=8E=D1=87=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B8 =D0=BA=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0= =B5=D0=BD=D1=82=D0=B0 =D0=BA vpn =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=83=D1=87=D0=B0=D1=8E= :=20 > GRE: Bad checksum from pppd. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=3D20050715000948.GC= 8840%40hp.com From: James Cameron - 2005-07-15 00:10 > "GRE: Bad checksum from pppd" That always appears and nobody has bothered to find out why, as it has no effect on the outcome. Even I see it in testing before releasing a new version. I'm tempted to ignore it until someone can tell me why I shouldn't. ;-} > CTRL: Ignored a SET LINK INFO packet with real ACCMs! http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3D20070515235454.GD56= 23%40hp.com From: James Cameron - 2007-05-15 23:55=20 On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:01:11PM +0200, marcop wrote: > Apr 26 23:09:15 freebsd pptpd[99783]: CTRL: Ignored a SET > LINK INFO packet with real ACCMs!=20 Shrug. We get this all the time. I see no need to fix it. Last time I checked, it was unimportant. If you think pptpd is not complying with the RFC in this, then we should change the message to make that clearer. > =D0=B2 =D1=87=D0=B5=D0=BC =D0=BF=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B1=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BC=D0= =BC=D0=B0 =D0=B8 =D0=BA=D0=B0=D0=BA =D0=B5=D0=B5 =D1=80=D0=B5=D1=88=D0=B8= =D1=82=D1=8C? =D0=A2=D0=B0=D0=BA =D0=B2 =D1=87=D1=91=D0=BC =D1=83 =D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=81 =D0= =BF=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B1=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BC=D0=B0? --=20 Peter. --=-jj9X0DuiWBPWyEOiykC1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=AD=D1=82=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=87=D0=B0=D1=81=D1=82=D1=8C?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=8F?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=86=D0=B8=D1=84=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=B9?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D1=8E?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHNvZsz6tlgEWSarMRAtVyAJ44M6tHJVEkjyx+l47ufzQamZ2TmgCeOwEn Hzm0HeeAXYcywjqg9S8ZUtM= =wX4h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jj9X0DuiWBPWyEOiykC1--