From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <434D6698.3030902@altlinux.org> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 23:40:08 +0400 From: Alexey Rusakov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050815 Thunderbird/1.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: shigorin@gmail.com, =?UTF-8?B?0LrRg9C70YzRgtGD0YDQvdGL0Lkg0L7RhNGC0L4=?= =?UTF-8?B?0L/QuNC6?= Subject: Re: [room] Fwd: Ubuntu licensing References: <20051012164144.GG13732@osdn.org.ua> In-Reply-To: <20051012164144.GG13732@osdn.org.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: X-BeenThere: smoke-room@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?koi8-r?b?y9XM2NTV0s7ZyiDPxtTP0MnL?= List-Id: =?koi8-r?b?y9XM2NTV0s7ZyiDPxtTP0MnL?= List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:40:10 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Michael Shigorin wrote: >I think it is CRUCIAL that we lay ubuntus licensing as clear as >possible, because I can not seem to find any figures. > >is it: >$0 per physical processor, >$0 per virtual processor or >$0 per installed megabyte of ram? > >it is important for the adoption of ubuntu in the enterprise to clear up >these matters! > > Издевается, подумал Мюллер... -- Alexey "Ktirf" Rusakov