From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <alecs@altlinux.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS
	autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Message-ID: <4BC3A72D.5010801@altlinux.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:05:17 +0300
From: Alex Negulescu <alecs@altlinux.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: alexei-mezin@rambler.ru,
	ALT Linux Sisyphus discussions <sisyphus@lists.altlinux.org>
References: <4BBF04D3.4000100@altlinux.com>	<1270810793.3327.0.camel@marsh.altlinux.lan>	<hpn1fh$5eu$1@dough.gmane.org>	<20100412063322.GZ5759@osdn.org.ua>	<4BC2EEEF.809@wdu.ro>	<20100412121601.GQ5753@osdn.org.ua>	<hq067u$tud$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<4BC3A062.6070004@altlinux.org> <hq08m3$58l$1@dough.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <hq08m3$58l$1@dough.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [sisyphus] New udev broken?
X-BeenThere: sisyphus@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussions <sisyphus@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussions <sisyphus.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/sisyphus>,
	<mailto:sisyphus-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/sisyphus>
List-Post: <mailto:sisyphus@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sisyphus-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/sisyphus>,
	<mailto:sisyphus-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:05:23 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/sisyphus/4BC3A72D.5010801@altlinux.org/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/sisyphus/>
List-Post: <mailto:sisyphus@altlinux.ru>

On 04/13/2010 02:00 AM, Alexei V. Mezin wrote:
> 13.04.2010 02:36, Alex Negulescu пишет:
>
>> If you can compare the initrds (the working one and the failing one):
>
> Here it is:
>
> working kernel (2.6.32-un-def-alt1)
>
> scsi_mod.ko
> sd_mod.ko
> megaraid_mm.ko
> megaraid_mbox.ko
> libata.ko
> pata_amd.ko
> pata_acpi.ko
> sata_nv.ko
> sata_sil24.ko
> ata_generic.ko
> crc-t10dif.ko
> exportfs.ko
> xfs.ko
>
> Same result with _mkinitrd_ and new kernel. But it does not work.
>
>
> List of modules from _make-initrd_ and new kernel:
>
> crc-t10dif.ko
> megaraid_mm.ko
> megaraid_mbox.ko
> scsi_mod.ko
> sd_mod.ko
> exportfs.ko
> xfs.ko
>
>
> Any ideas? Will try to blacklist pata*/ata* tomorrow.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sisyphus mailing list
> Sisyphus@lists.altlinux.org
> https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/sisyphus

Mda, that's what I'm trying too, to add the right modules with
make-initrd, but without luck. How could this be done, I wonder ?
I think you would need to add at least sata_sil24.ko for the machine to
boot :(

My 2 cents..