From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <42DC964E.6090606@altlinux.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:57:34 +0400 From: Anton Farygin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050512) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussion list Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060704030009060904080101" Cc: Subject: [sisyphus] [Fwd: Re: [Vserver] About v2.0] X-BeenThere: sisyphus@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussion list List-Id: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 06:00:47 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060704030009060904080101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FYI. --------------060704030009060904080101 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Re: [Vserver] About v2.0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Re: [Vserver] About v2.0" Return-Path: X-Original-To: rider@altlinux.com Delivered-To: rider@master.altlinux.org Received: from daffy.hulpsystems.net (daffy.hulpsystems.net [66.98.205.98]) by master.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAEDE31FC for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:33:38 +0400 (MSD) Received: from localhost (daffy.hulpsystems.net [66.98.205.98]) by daffy.hulpsystems.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5216C3DFFEC; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:33:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daffy.hulpsystems.net ([66.98.205.98]) by localhost (daffy.hulpsystems.net [66.98.205.98]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06358-10; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:33:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (daffy.hulpsystems.net [66.98.205.98]) by daffy.hulpsystems.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C375A3DFE9B for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:33:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daffy.hulpsystems.net ([66.98.205.98]) by localhost (daffy.hulpsystems.net [66.98.205.98]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06764-06 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:33:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.13thfloor.at (MAIL.13thfloor.at [212.16.62.50]) by daffy.hulpsystems.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6D63DFE95 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:33:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.13thfloor.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B9B7E3FCE9; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:33:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:33:16 +0200 From: Herbert Poetzl To: Javier Navarro Subject: Re: [Vserver] About v2.0 Message-ID: <20050719053316.GC4829@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Mail-Followup-To: Javier Navarro , vserver@list.linux-vserver.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by TuxBox Antivirus Service - amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at daffy.hulpsystems.net Cc: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org X-BeenThere: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org List-Id: vserver.list.linux-vserver.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: vserver-bounces@list.linux-vserver.org Errors-To: vserver-bounces@list.linux-vserver.org X-Virus-Scanned: by TuxBox Antivirus Service - amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at daffy.hulpsystems.net On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:37:41PM +0200, Javier Navarro wrote: > > Hello Herbert, > > Thank you very much for your work and your help. my pleasure ... > I'm waiting for the release version of vserver v2.0. But I've test rc6 > and it seems to work well. When do you think I may configure v2.0 in > production? I still use v1.2.0. several companies are already using the 1.9.x or 2.0-rc* versions in production, so I guess they are compareable to the 1.2.x versions (at least regarding 1.2.x features) although not nearly as well tested (naturally) ... it will take a few more days (maybe a fortnight) until we are convinced that it is _final_ and 2.0 will then be release (of course, shortly after that release, a lot of bugs/issues will be discovered, when the folks waiting for a stable release start using it, instead of testing the release candidates :) anyway, I'm very confident that we ironed out most of the real issues and that 2.0.x will be pretty stable (and of course it will provide an excellent migration path from 1.2.x) HTH, Herbert > Regards, > Javier > > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver --------------060704030009060904080101--