From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id:from; bh=c1DJaHJoLjEqtgd+6m9U8EuCcmIeEVF/jZKlPRbCom4=; b=fJfXajw+xmU/ffREawrrP4r9UdKT2Xeh48pW1TDXkAm7wROXPH1iRw3XzVuzne+A1D tprvQQt2DfXvjE9zVCLDWVUsvH7OoVW+pYSlBnmHRcS5DKxP28kbqHtch3MnJizgRtMV /ZVhjGdVGdW9PoYad5i7sETLOPYLR/mTbhJNs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from; b=NhWIwvyszaLRnsmgJ4sFXtQ9ADJOgYZxcXrFKavogyKgVfjiKGMn1ZfDkGsGxhmj6g j4DQ4NxIijnitQMwyGi92N5VRiOG6Lb2ZZM1vB4Cq54npR4ietn2wRqEIswAfngW3SS5 Gy+2NXjLQksvj9gRjD22D4sitTpkGOOETB320= To: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussions Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:28:00 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809101328.00827.trash4@yandex.ru> From: Guest007 Subject: [sisyphus] openldap vs fedora-ds X-BeenThere: sisyphus@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: trash4@yandex.ru, ALT Linux Sisyphus discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:28:17 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Приветствую В Сизифе есть оба продукта. Хотелось бы узнать мнение народа - чем они отличаются? Как в плане функционала, так и в плане лёгкости прикручивания к нашим сборкам самбы, (е)джаббера и т.д. Заранее благодарен.