From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 14:54:29 +0600 From: Andrey Rahmatullin To: sisyphus@altlinux.ru Subject: Re: [sisyphus] kernels Message-ID: <20050518085429.GD9637@wrars-comp.wrarsdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Rahmatullin , sisyphus@altlinux.ru References: <200505180942.03379.Leonid.Danilov@fors.md> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="en9/O5YN3eJ0yPaf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: ALT Linux Sisyphus User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8+cvs20050213i X-Spam-Status: Unsure, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.554527, IP:194.226.152.43 X-Sagator-Scanner: 0.5.4-0rc6 at d163; drop(clamd()) deliver(BogoFilter()) X-Sagator-id: 20050518-150028-0001-04534-7hMSk9 X-BeenThere: sisyphus@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussion list List-Id: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 09:01:00 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: --en9/O5YN3eJ0yPaf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:52:07AM +0300, Eugene Ostapets wrote: > std26-up (=D0=CF=CB=C1 =CE=C5 =D0=CF=D1=D7=C9=D4=D3=D1 =CF=C2=CE=CF=D7=CC= =C5=CE=C9=C5 =CD=C9=CB=D2=CF=CB=CF=C4=C1, =D2=C5=DB=C1=C0=DD=C5=C5 =D0=D2= =CF=C2=CC=C5=CD=D5 =D3 > =C2=C1=C7=CF=CD =D0=D2=CF=C3=C5=D3=D3=CF=D2=CF=D7 P4 HT), =DA=C1=D4=C5=CD= =CD=CF=D6=CE=CF =D0=C5=D2=C5=CA=D4=C9 =CE=C1 std26-smp =E2=C1=C7 =CE=C1=D3=D4=CF=CC=D8=CB=CF =D3=C5=D2=D8=C5=DA=C5=CE? "As to the HT 'vulnerability', it really seems to be not a whole lot different than what people saw with early SMP and (small) direct-mapped caches. Thank God those days are gone. "I'd be really surprised if somebody is actually able to get a real-world attack on a real-world pgp key usage or similar out of it (and as to the covert channel, nobody cares). It's a fairly interesting approach, but it's certainly neither new nor HT-specific, [nor does it] necessarily seem all that worrying in real life." (Linus, http://kerneltrap.org/node/5120) --=20 WBR, wRAR (ALT Linux Team) Powered by the ALT Linux fortune(8): doc-work: =C1 =D4=D9 =D2=C5=C1=CC=D8=CE=CF "work" =C9=CC=C9 =D0= =D2=C9=CB=C9=C4=D9=D7=C1=C5=DB=D8=D3=D1? =3D) drF_ckoff, =D2=C5=C1=CC=D8=CE=CF. =E2=CC=C9=CE, =D3=C5=C7=CF=C4= =CE=D1 =D0=D2=CF=CB=CF=CE=D3=D5=CC=D8=D4=C9=D2=CF=D7=C1=CC =D5=D6=C5 =DE=C5=D4=D9=D2=C5=C8 =C2=CF=CC=D8=CE=D9=C8 =D0=D2=CF=C7=D2=C1= =CD=CD=C1=D2=C5=CA - =C5=D0=C9=C4=C5=CD=C9=CA =CB=C1=CB=CF=CA-=D4=CF.=20 doc-work: =D0=CF=DA=D9=D7=D9 =CE=C1 =D2=D7=CF=D4=D5 =D0=D2=C9 =D7= =C9=C4=C5 =D4=D9=D2=C5=CE=CE=D9=C8 =C9=D3=C8=CF=C4=CE=C9=CB=CF=D7 =C1=D5=D4= =CC=D5=CB=C1 ?=20 --en9/O5YN3eJ0yPaf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCiwLFB4Vf7hFmt5URAs23AJ4sE7T8FAgjWR40iQlhG7TFyK82+gCeLnUk W+5fCnCBY7iGaLigQ6I6W7I= =i8RF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --en9/O5YN3eJ0yPaf--