From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:35:30 +0200 From: Michael Shigorin To: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussion list Message-ID: <20041223143530.GQ9534@osdn.org.ua> Mail-Followup-To: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussion list References: <41CAAFD8.9030508@solin.spb.ru> <20041223115229.GL20998@osdn.org.ua> <20041223155657.3e41d0be@localhost.localdomain> <20041223131446.GN9534@osdn.org.ua> <20041223163734.1a2045ca@localhost.localdomain> <20041223135423.GP9534@osdn.org.ua> <20041223165910.06c48d2c@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20041223165910.06c48d2c@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: [sisyphus] Re: apache suexec (path) revisited X-BeenThere: sisyphus@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussion list List-Id: ALT Linux Sisyphus discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 14:35:36 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 04:59:10PM +0300, Konstantin Klimchev wrote: > И еще, в updates пойдет такое решение (2 suexec'а)? Возможно, хотя не хотелось бы. А в backports -- спокойно. -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/