[sisyphus] [tpot@samba.org: Re: Winbindd Memory Leak]

[Alexander Bokovoy <a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net>]

Можно надеяться, что дырка, в которую утекает память в Winbindd,
будет закрыта еще до выхода 2.2.2. По крайней мере, причина утекания
обнаружена.

----- Forwarded message from Tim Potter <tpot@samba.org> -----

Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 09:32:57 +1000 (EST)
From: Tim Potter <tpot@samba.org>
To: "Esh, Andrew" <AEsh@tricord.com>,
	"Samba-Technical (E-mail)" <samba-technical@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Winbindd Memory Leak

Tim Potter writes:

> > The size of the leak varies from 8 to 12 bytes, but the stack
> > is always identical. The call to talloc implies that all of
> > this leaked memory could be freed at one point by calling
> > talloc_destroy. My problem is, I don't know (yet) where to do
> > that. The obvious place is somewhere in the stack listed
> > above, but I don't quite see where yet.
> 
> There is a call to lp_talloc_free() in the winbindd main loop
> which should free memory as it is going along.  This only frees
> memory from the global tdb used for parameter strings.  I suspect
> there is another TALLOC_CTX that is being used, probably in the
> rpc code, that is not being freed.  I'm taking a look at it now.

Jeremy and I have decided to do a bit of refactoring (i.e
chainsaw work) on connection and memory management in winbind.
It may make it in to 2.2.


Tim.

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
/ Alexander Bokovoy
$ cat /proc/identity >~/.signature
  `Senior software developer and analyst for SaM-Solutions Ltd.`
---
Only a fool has no doubts.