From: Girar Builder awaiter robot <girar-builder@altlinux.org>
To: Igor Vlasenko <viy@altlinux.org>
Cc: sisyphus-incominger@lists.altlinux.org
Subject: [#201477] FAILED srpm=jadetex-3.13-alt4_13.src.rpm
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:29:11 +0000
Message-ID: <20180306162911.GA5935@gyle.altlinux.org> (raw)
http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/201477/logs/events.1.1.log
2018-Mar-06 16:22:05 :: task #201477 for sisyphus started by viy:
#100 build jadetex-3.13-alt4_13.src.rpm
2018-Mar-06 16:22:05 :: [i586] #100 jadetex-3.13-alt4_13.src.rpm: build start
2018-Mar-06 16:22:05 :: [x86_64] #100 jadetex-3.13-alt4_13.src.rpm: build start
2018-Mar-06 16:25:08 :: [x86_64] #100 jadetex-3.13-alt4_13.src.rpm: build OK
2018-Mar-06 16:25:21 :: [i586] #100 jadetex-3.13-alt4_13.src.rpm: build OK
2018-Mar-06 16:25:24 :: build check OK
2018-Mar-06 16:25:24 :: noarch check OK
2018-Mar-06 16:25:26 :: plan: src +1 -1 =18190, noarch +1 -1 =18451
2018-Mar-06 16:25:26 :: version check OK
2018-Mar-06 16:25:58 :: generated apt indices
2018-Mar-06 16:25:58 :: created next repo
2018-Mar-06 16:26:17 :: dependencies check OK
x86_64: jadetex=3.13-alt4_13 install failed:
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
MI2a: mark jadetex
MI2a: delete texlive
Starting
Starting 2
Investigating jadetex
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 8 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Added texlive to the remove list
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 8 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Added texlive to the remove list
Fixing jadetex via keep of texlive
Fixing jadetex via keep of texlive
Investigating jadetex
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 8 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Added texlive to the remove list
Fixing jadetex via remove of texlive
Investigating texlive-texmf
Package texlive-texmf has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 8 as a solution to texlive-texmf 15
Added texlive to the remove list
Fixing texlive-texmf via keep of texlive
Investigating jadetex
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 8 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Added texlive to the remove list
Fixing jadetex via remove of texlive
Investigating texlive-texmf
Package texlive-texmf has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 9999 as a solution to texlive-texmf 15
Removing texlive-texmf rather than change texlive
Investigating texlive-collection-basic
Package texlive-collection-basic has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 9999 as a solution to texlive-collection-basic 14
Removing texlive-collection-basic rather than change texlive
Investigating texlive-dist
Package texlive-dist has broken dep on texlive-texmf
Considering texlive-texmf 9999 as a solution to texlive-dist 11
Removing texlive-dist rather than change texlive-texmf
Investigating texlive-context
Package texlive-context has broken dep on texlive-texmf
Considering texlive-texmf 9999 as a solution to texlive-context 5
Removing texlive-context rather than change texlive-texmf
Investigating ghostscript-utils
Package ghostscript-utils has broken dep on /usr/bin/dvips
Considering texlive 9999 as a solution to ghostscript-utils 5
Removing ghostscript-utils rather than change /usr/bin/dvips
Investigating jadetex
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive-texmf
Considering texlive-texmf 9999 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 9999 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 9999 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive-texmf
Considering texlive-texmf 9999 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive-texmf
Considering texlive-texmf 9999 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
jadetex: Depends: texlive-texmf
PreDepends: texlive
PreDepends: texlive
PreDepends: texlive-texmf
PreDepends: texlive-texmf
E: Broken packages
hsh-install: Failed to calculate package file list.
hsh-install: Failed to generate package file list.
2018-Mar-06 16:29:04 :: [x86_64] #100 jadetex: install check FAILED
i586: jadetex=3.13-alt4_13 install failed:
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
MI2a: mark jadetex
MI2a: delete texlive
Starting
Starting 2
Investigating jadetex
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 8 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Added texlive to the remove list
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 8 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Added texlive to the remove list
Fixing jadetex via keep of texlive
Fixing jadetex via keep of texlive
Investigating jadetex
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 8 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Added texlive to the remove list
Fixing jadetex via remove of texlive
Investigating texlive-texmf
Package texlive-texmf has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 8 as a solution to texlive-texmf 15
Added texlive to the remove list
Fixing texlive-texmf via keep of texlive
Investigating jadetex
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 8 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Added texlive to the remove list
Fixing jadetex via remove of texlive
Investigating texlive-texmf
Package texlive-texmf has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 9999 as a solution to texlive-texmf 15
Removing texlive-texmf rather than change texlive
Investigating texlive-collection-basic
Package texlive-collection-basic has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 9999 as a solution to texlive-collection-basic 14
Removing texlive-collection-basic rather than change texlive
Investigating texlive-dist
Package texlive-dist has broken dep on texlive-texmf
Considering texlive-texmf 9999 as a solution to texlive-dist 11
Removing texlive-dist rather than change texlive-texmf
Investigating texlive-context
Package texlive-context has broken dep on texlive-texmf
Considering texlive-texmf 9999 as a solution to texlive-context 5
Removing texlive-context rather than change texlive-texmf
Investigating ghostscript-utils
Package ghostscript-utils has broken dep on /usr/bin/dvips
Considering texlive 9999 as a solution to ghostscript-utils 5
Removing ghostscript-utils rather than change /usr/bin/dvips
Investigating jadetex
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive-texmf
Considering texlive-texmf 9999 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 9999 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive
Considering texlive 9999 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive-texmf
Considering texlive-texmf 9999 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Package jadetex has broken dep on texlive-texmf
Considering texlive-texmf 9999 as a solution to jadetex 9999
Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
jadetex: Depends: texlive-texmf
PreDepends: texlive
PreDepends: texlive
PreDepends: texlive-texmf
PreDepends: texlive-texmf
E: Broken packages
hsh-install: Failed to calculate package file list.
hsh-install: Failed to generate package file list.
2018-Mar-06 16:29:10 :: [i586] #100 jadetex: install check FAILED
2018-Mar-06 16:29:04 :: [x86_64] install check FAILED
2018-Mar-06 16:29:10 :: [i586] install check FAILED
2018-Mar-06 16:29:10 :: task #201477 for sisyphus FAILED
reply other threads:[~2018-03-06 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180306162911.GA5935@gyle.altlinux.org \
--to=girar-builder@altlinux.org \
--cc=sisyphus-incominger@lists.altlinux.org \
--cc=viy@altlinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
ALT Linux Girar Builder robot reports
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror http://lore.altlinux.org/sisyphus-incominger/0 sisyphus-incominger/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 sisyphus-incominger sisyphus-incominger/ http://lore.altlinux.org/sisyphus-incominger \
sisyphus-incominger@lists.altlinux.org sisyphus-incominger@lists.altlinux.ru sisyphus-incominger@lists.altlinux.com
public-inbox-index sisyphus-incominger
Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
nntp://lore.altlinux.org/org.altlinux.lists.sisyphus-incominger
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git