From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 11:35:37 +0000 From: Girar Builder awaiter robot To: Nazarov Denis Subject: [#141179] FAILED mbedtls.git=1.3.10-alt1 Message-ID: <20150228113537.GA26192@gitery.altlinux.org> Mail-Followup-To: girar-builder@altlinux.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-girar-task-id: 141179 X-girar-task-owner: nenderus X-girar-task-repo: sisyphus X-girar-task-try: 1 X-girar-task-iter: 1 X-girar-task-status: FAILED X-girar-task-URL: http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/141179/ X-girar-task-log: logs/events.1.1.log X-girar-task-summary: [#141179] FAILED mbedtls.git=1.3.10-alt1 Cc: sisyphus-incominger@lists.altlinux.org X-BeenThere: sisyphus-incominger@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: nenderus@altlinux.org List-Id: ALT Linux Girar Builder robot reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 11:35:38 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/141179/logs/events.1.1.log 2015-Feb-28 11:29:01 :: task #141179 for sisyphus started by nenderus: #100 build 1.3.10-alt1 from /people/nenderus/packages/mbedtls.git 2015-Feb-28 11:29:01 :: [i586] #100 mbedtls.git 1.3.10-alt1: build start 2015-Feb-28 11:29:01 :: [x86_64] #100 mbedtls.git 1.3.10-alt1: build start 2015-Feb-28 11:31:44 :: [x86_64] #100 mbedtls.git 1.3.10-alt1: build OK 2015-Feb-28 11:31:54 :: [i586] #100 mbedtls.git 1.3.10-alt1: build OK 2015-Feb-28 11:32:01 :: build check OK 2015-Feb-28 11:32:02 :: noarch check OK 2015-Feb-28 11:32:03 :: plan: src +1 -0 =17511, i586 +5 -0 =32913, x86_64 +5 -0 =32840 2015-Feb-28 11:32:03 :: version check OK 2015-Feb-28 11:33:17 :: generated apt indices 2015-Feb-28 11:33:17 :: created next repo 2015-Feb-28 11:33:31 :: dependencies check OK 2015-Feb-28 11:33:57 :: ELF symbols check OK 2015-Feb-28 11:34:23 :: [x86_64] #100 libmbedtls: install check OK 2015-Feb-28 11:34:25 :: [i586] #100 libmbedtls: install check OK 2015-Feb-28 11:34:40 :: [x86_64] #100 libmbedtls-debuginfo: install check OK 2015-Feb-28 11:34:44 :: [i586] #100 libmbedtls-debuginfo: install check OK 2015-Feb-28 11:34:57 :: [x86_64] #100 libmbedtls-devel: install check OK 2015-Feb-28 11:35:03 :: [i586] #100 libmbedtls-devel: install check OK x86_64: mbedtls-utils=1.3.10-alt1 install failed: Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... MI2a: mark mbedtls-utils MI2a: delete coreutils Starting Starting 2 Investigating basesystem Package basesystem has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to basesystem 3004 Added coreutils to the remove list Fixing basesystem via keep of coreutils Investigating mbedtls-utils Package mbedtls-utils has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to mbedtls-utils 9999 Added coreutils to the remove list Fixing mbedtls-utils via remove of coreutils Investigating basesystem Package basesystem has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to basesystem 3004 Added coreutils to the remove list Fixing basesystem via keep of coreutils Investigating mbedtls-utils Package mbedtls-utils has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to mbedtls-utils 9999 Added coreutils to the remove list Fixing mbedtls-utils via remove of coreutils Investigating basesystem Package basesystem has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 9999 as a solution to basesystem 3004 Removing basesystem rather than change coreutils Investigating util-linux Package util-linux has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 9999 as a solution to util-linux 9 Removing util-linux rather than change coreutils Investigating rpm Package rpm has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 9999 as a solution to rpm 9 Removing rpm rather than change coreutils Investigating control Package control has broken dep on /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d Considering rpm 9999 as a solution to control 8 Removing control rather than change /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d Investigating passwdqc-control Package passwdqc-control has broken dep on /etc/control.d/facilities(control_subst) Considering control 9999 as a solution to passwdqc-control 5 Removing passwdqc-control rather than change /etc/control.d/facilities(control_subst) Investigating libpasswdqc Package libpasswdqc has broken dep on passwdqc-control Considering passwdqc-control 9999 as a solution to libpasswdqc 4 Removing libpasswdqc rather than change passwdqc-control Investigating pam0_tcb Package pam0_tcb has broken dep on control Considering control 9999 as a solution to pam0_tcb 3 Removing pam0_tcb rather than change control Investigating util-linux-control Package util-linux-control has broken dep on /etc/control.d/facilities(control_fmode) Considering control 9999 as a solution to util-linux-control 3 Removing util-linux-control rather than change /etc/control.d/facilities(control_fmode) Investigating pam-config-control Package pam-config-control has broken dep on /etc/control.d/facilities(control_help) Considering control 9999 as a solution to pam-config-control 3 Removing pam-config-control rather than change /etc/control.d/facilities(control_help) Investigating vim-minimal Package vim-minimal has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 9999 as a solution to vim-minimal 3 Removing vim-minimal rather than change coreutils Investigating pam-config Package pam-config has broken dep on pam-config-control Considering pam-config-control 9999 as a solution to pam-config 1 Removing pam-config rather than change pam-config-control Investigating pam0-config Package pam0-config has broken dep on pam-config Considering pam-config 9999 as a solution to pam0-config 0 Removing pam0-config rather than change pam-config Investigating fakeroot Package fakeroot has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 9999 as a solution to fakeroot 0 Removing fakeroot rather than change coreutils Investigating pam0_mktemp Package pam0_mktemp has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 9999 as a solution to pam0_mktemp 0 Removing pam0_mktemp rather than change coreutils Investigating pam0_passwdqc Package pam0_passwdqc has broken dep on libpasswdqc Considering libpasswdqc 9999 as a solution to pam0_passwdqc 0 Removing pam0_passwdqc rather than change libpasswdqc Investigating pam Package pam has broken dep on pam-common Considering pam-config 9999 as a solution to pam 0 Removing pam rather than change pam-common Investigating libpam0 Package libpam0 has broken dep on pam-common Considering pam-config 9999 as a solution to libpam0 1006 Removing libpam0 rather than change pam-common Investigating shadow-utils Package shadow-utils has broken dep on /etc/pam.d Considering pam-config 9999 as a solution to shadow-utils 12 Removing shadow-utils rather than change /etc/pam.d Investigating etcskel Package etcskel has broken dep on shadow-utils Considering shadow-utils 9999 as a solution to etcskel 9 Removing etcskel rather than change shadow-utils Investigating vitmp Package vitmp has broken dep on vim-minimal Considering vim-minimal 9999 as a solution to vitmp 9 Removing vitmp rather than change vim-minimal Investigating tcb-utils Package tcb-utils has broken dep on pam0_tcb Considering pam0_tcb 9999 as a solution to tcb-utils 5 Removing tcb-utils rather than change pam0_tcb Investigating pam0_userpass Package pam0_userpass has broken dep on libpam.so.0()(64bit) Considering libpam0 9999 as a solution to pam0_userpass 0 Removing pam0_userpass rather than change libpam.so.0()(64bit) Done The following packages will be REMOVED: basesystem control coreutils etcskel fakeroot libpam0 libpasswdqc pam pam-config pam-config-control pam0-config pam0_mktemp pam0_passwdqc pam0_tcb pam0_userpass passwdqc-control rpm shadow-utils tcb-utils util-linux util-linux-control vim-minimal vitmp The following NEW packages will be installed: mbedtls-utils WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing! basesystem coreutils (due to basesystem) etcskel (due to basesystem) rpm (due to basesystem) shadow-utils (due to basesystem) util-linux (due to basesystem) vitmp (due to basesystem) 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 23 removed and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/77.3kB of archives. After unpacking 24.5MB disk space will be freed. E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes hsh-install: Failed to calculate package file list. hsh-install: Failed to generate package file list. 2015-Feb-28 11:35:13 :: [x86_64] #100 mbedtls-utils: install check FAILED i586: mbedtls-utils=1.3.10-alt1 install failed: Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... MI2a: mark mbedtls-utils MI2a: delete coreutils Starting Starting 2 Investigating basesystem Package basesystem has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to basesystem 3004 Added coreutils to the remove list Fixing basesystem via keep of coreutils Investigating mbedtls-utils Package mbedtls-utils has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to mbedtls-utils 9999 Added coreutils to the remove list Fixing mbedtls-utils via remove of coreutils Investigating basesystem Package basesystem has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to basesystem 3004 Added coreutils to the remove list Fixing basesystem via keep of coreutils Investigating mbedtls-utils Package mbedtls-utils has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to mbedtls-utils 9999 Added coreutils to the remove list Fixing mbedtls-utils via remove of coreutils Investigating basesystem Package basesystem has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 9999 as a solution to basesystem 3004 Removing basesystem rather than change coreutils Investigating util-linux Package util-linux has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 9999 as a solution to util-linux 9 Removing util-linux rather than change coreutils Investigating rpm Package rpm has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 9999 as a solution to rpm 9 Removing rpm rather than change coreutils Investigating control Package control has broken dep on /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d Considering rpm 9999 as a solution to control 8 Removing control rather than change /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d Investigating passwdqc-control Package passwdqc-control has broken dep on /etc/control.d/facilities(control_subst) Considering control 9999 as a solution to passwdqc-control 5 Removing passwdqc-control rather than change /etc/control.d/facilities(control_subst) Investigating libpasswdqc Package libpasswdqc has broken dep on passwdqc-control Considering passwdqc-control 9999 as a solution to libpasswdqc 4 Removing libpasswdqc rather than change passwdqc-control Investigating pam0_tcb Package pam0_tcb has broken dep on control Considering control 9999 as a solution to pam0_tcb 3 Removing pam0_tcb rather than change control Investigating util-linux-control Package util-linux-control has broken dep on /etc/control.d/facilities(control_fmode) Considering control 9999 as a solution to util-linux-control 3 Removing util-linux-control rather than change /etc/control.d/facilities(control_fmode) Investigating pam-config-control Package pam-config-control has broken dep on /etc/control.d/facilities(control_help) Considering control 9999 as a solution to pam-config-control 3 Removing pam-config-control rather than change /etc/control.d/facilities(control_help) Investigating vim-minimal Package vim-minimal has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 9999 as a solution to vim-minimal 3 Removing vim-minimal rather than change coreutils Investigating pam-config Package pam-config has broken dep on pam-config-control Considering pam-config-control 9999 as a solution to pam-config 1 Removing pam-config rather than change pam-config-control Investigating pam0-config Package pam0-config has broken dep on pam-config Considering pam-config 9999 as a solution to pam0-config 0 Removing pam0-config rather than change pam-config Investigating fakeroot Package fakeroot has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 9999 as a solution to fakeroot 0 Removing fakeroot rather than change coreutils Investigating pam0_mktemp Package pam0_mktemp has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 9999 as a solution to pam0_mktemp 0 Removing pam0_mktemp rather than change coreutils Investigating pam0_passwdqc Package pam0_passwdqc has broken dep on libpasswdqc Considering libpasswdqc 9999 as a solution to pam0_passwdqc 0 Removing pam0_passwdqc rather than change libpasswdqc Investigating pam Package pam has broken dep on pam-common Considering pam-config 9999 as a solution to pam 0 Removing pam rather than change pam-common Investigating libpam0 Package libpam0 has broken dep on pam-common Considering pam-config 9999 as a solution to libpam0 1006 Removing libpam0 rather than change pam-common Investigating shadow-utils Package shadow-utils has broken dep on /etc/pam.d Considering pam-config 9999 as a solution to shadow-utils 12 Removing shadow-utils rather than change /etc/pam.d Investigating etcskel Package etcskel has broken dep on shadow-utils Considering shadow-utils 9999 as a solution to etcskel 9 Removing etcskel rather than change shadow-utils Investigating vitmp Package vitmp has broken dep on vim-minimal Considering vim-minimal 9999 as a solution to vitmp 9 Removing vitmp rather than change vim-minimal Investigating tcb-utils Package tcb-utils has broken dep on pam0_tcb Considering pam0_tcb 9999 as a solution to tcb-utils 5 Removing tcb-utils rather than change pam0_tcb Investigating pam0_userpass Package pam0_userpass has broken dep on libpam.so.0 Considering libpam0 9999 as a solution to pam0_userpass 0 Removing pam0_userpass rather than change libpam.so.0 Done The following packages will be REMOVED: basesystem control coreutils etcskel fakeroot libpam0 libpasswdqc pam pam-config pam-config-control pam0-config pam0_mktemp pam0_passwdqc pam0_tcb pam0_userpass passwdqc-control rpm shadow-utils tcb-utils util-linux util-linux-control vim-minimal vitmp The following NEW packages will be installed: mbedtls-utils WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing! basesystem coreutils (due to basesystem) etcskel (due to basesystem) rpm (due to basesystem) shadow-utils (due to basesystem) util-linux (due to basesystem) vitmp (due to basesystem) 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 23 removed and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/75.9kB of archives. After unpacking 24.5MB disk space will be freed. E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes hsh-install: Failed to calculate package file list. hsh-install: Failed to generate package file list. 2015-Feb-28 11:35:19 :: [i586] #100 mbedtls-utils: install check FAILED x86_64: mbedtls-utils-debuginfo=1.3.10-alt1 install failed: Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... MI2a: mark mbedtls-utils-debuginfo MI2a: target mbedtls-utils MI2a: mark mbedtls-utils MI2a: delete coreutils Starting Starting 2 Investigating basesystem Package basesystem has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to basesystem 3004 Added coreutils to the remove list Fixing basesystem via keep of coreutils Investigating mbedtls-utils Package mbedtls-utils has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to mbedtls-utils 2 Holding Back mbedtls-utils rather than change coreutils Investigating mbedtls-utils-debuginfo Package mbedtls-utils-debuginfo has broken dep on mbedtls-utils Considering mbedtls-utils 2 as a solution to mbedtls-utils-debuginfo 9999 Re-Instated mbedtls-utils Investigating mbedtls-utils Package mbedtls-utils has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to mbedtls-utils 2 Holding Back mbedtls-utils rather than change coreutils Investigating mbedtls-utils-debuginfo Package mbedtls-utils-debuginfo has broken dep on mbedtls-utils Considering mbedtls-utils 2 as a solution to mbedtls-utils-debuginfo 9999 Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: mbedtls-utils-debuginfo: Depends: mbedtls-utils (= 1.3.10-alt1) E: Broken packages hsh-install: Failed to calculate package file list. hsh-install: Failed to generate package file list. 2015-Feb-28 11:35:30 :: [x86_64] #100 mbedtls-utils-debuginfo: install check FAILED i586: mbedtls-utils-debuginfo=1.3.10-alt1 install failed: Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... MI2a: mark mbedtls-utils-debuginfo MI2a: target mbedtls-utils MI2a: mark mbedtls-utils MI2a: delete coreutils Starting Starting 2 Investigating basesystem Package basesystem has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to basesystem 3004 Added coreutils to the remove list Fixing basesystem via keep of coreutils Investigating mbedtls-utils Package mbedtls-utils has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to mbedtls-utils 2 Holding Back mbedtls-utils rather than change coreutils Investigating mbedtls-utils-debuginfo Package mbedtls-utils-debuginfo has broken dep on mbedtls-utils Considering mbedtls-utils 2 as a solution to mbedtls-utils-debuginfo 9999 Re-Instated mbedtls-utils Investigating mbedtls-utils Package mbedtls-utils has broken dep on coreutils Considering coreutils 13 as a solution to mbedtls-utils 2 Holding Back mbedtls-utils rather than change coreutils Investigating mbedtls-utils-debuginfo Package mbedtls-utils-debuginfo has broken dep on mbedtls-utils Considering mbedtls-utils 2 as a solution to mbedtls-utils-debuginfo 9999 Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: mbedtls-utils-debuginfo: Depends: mbedtls-utils (= 1.3.10-alt1) E: Broken packages hsh-install: Failed to calculate package file list. hsh-install: Failed to generate package file list. 2015-Feb-28 11:35:37 :: [i586] #100 mbedtls-utils-debuginfo: install check FAILED 2015-Feb-28 11:35:30 :: [x86_64] install check FAILED 2015-Feb-28 11:35:37 :: [i586] install check FAILED 2015-Feb-28 11:35:37 :: task #141179 for sisyphus FAILED