From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:17:38 +0300 From: Vitaly Chikunov To: Open-source aspects of GOST Cryptography Message-ID: <20190402121738.wq6yss7hwkbl4lxg@altlinux.org> References: <20190401113223.xuwgz57f572ubvkm@altlinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215-106-ac61c7 Subject: Re: [oss-gost-crypto] Fwd: Re: Should we consider removing Streebog from the Linux Kernel? X-BeenThere: oss-gost-crypto@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Open-source aspects of GOST Cryptography List-Id: Open-source aspects of GOST Cryptography List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:17:39 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: Hi, On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 02:58:39PM +0300, Wartan Hachaturow wrote: > Совершенно непонятно в таком случае, почему открытый алгоритм от NIST > быть должен, а открытый алгоритм от другого standard body - не должен. > Или все, или никаких и один cha-cha c blowfish. Да много аргументов можно придумать. Но если ответ получается длиннее вопроса, то это явно был троллинг. В том обсуждении не понятно что надо, а что не надо доказывать и кому. На мой взгляд, наличие пользовательской базы достаточное основание для включения поддержки. > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, 14:32 Vitaly Chikunov <[1]vt@altlinux.org> wrote: > > Очередной наброс. > ----- Forwarded message from Jordan Glover > <[2]Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch> ----- > Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 10:51:11 +0000 > From: Jordan Glover <[3]Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch> > To: Vitaly Chikunov <[4]vt@altlinux.org> > Cc: Eric Biggers <[5]ebiggers@kernel.org>, Theodore Ts'o > <[6]tytso@mit.edu>, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <[7]Jason@zx2c4.com>, > "[8]herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" > <[9]herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, "[10]linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" > <[11]linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Re: Should we consider removing Streebog from the Linux > Kernel? > On Monday, April 1, 2019 10:04 AM, Vitaly Chikunov > <[12]vt@altlinux.org> wrote: > > > > > > Can you elaborate on why you want to use Streebog? When we added > Speck, we > > > explained in great detail why it was useful from a technical > perspective (before > > > Adiantum was ready). I don't see any such explanation for > Streebog. > > > > Our users demand that file integrity is implemented using their > national > > standard algorithm. > > > > Thanks, > Does it mean that every state can demand from Linux kernel to > carrying crypto > algorithms of their choice? > Jordan > ----- End forwarded message ----- > _______________________________________________ > oss-gost-crypto mailing list > [13]oss-gost-crypto@lists.altlinux.org > [14]https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/oss-gost-crypto > > References > > 1. mailto:vt@altlinux.org > 2. mailto:Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch > 3. mailto:Golden_Miller83@protonmail.ch > 4. mailto:vt@altlinux.org > 5. mailto:ebiggers@kernel.org > 6. mailto:tytso@mit.edu > 7. mailto:Jason@zx2c4.com > 8. mailto:herbert@gondor.apana.org.au > 9. mailto:herbert@gondor.apana.org.au > 10. mailto:linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org > 11. mailto:linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org > 12. mailto:vt@altlinux.org > 13. mailto:oss-gost-crypto@lists.altlinux.org > 14. https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/oss-gost-crypto > _______________________________________________ > oss-gost-crypto mailing list > oss-gost-crypto@lists.altlinux.org > https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/oss-gost-crypto