From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:32:23 +0300 From: Vitaly Chikunov To: oss-gost-crypto@lists.altlinux.org Message-ID: <20190401113223.xuwgz57f572ubvkm@altlinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215-106-ac61c7 Subject: [oss-gost-crypto] Fwd: Re: Should we consider removing Streebog from the Linux Kernel? X-BeenThere: oss-gost-crypto@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Open-source aspects of GOST Cryptography List-Id: Open-source aspects of GOST Cryptography List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 11:32:24 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: Очередной наброс. ----- Forwarded message from Jordan Glover ----- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 10:51:11 +0000 From: Jordan Glover To: Vitaly Chikunov Cc: Eric Biggers , Theodore Ts'o , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , "herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" , "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Should we consider removing Streebog from the Linux Kernel? On Monday, April 1, 2019 10:04 AM, Vitaly Chikunov wrote: > > > > Can you elaborate on why you want to use Streebog? When we added Speck, we > > explained in great detail why it was useful from a technical perspective (before > > Adiantum was ready). I don't see any such explanation for Streebog. > > Our users demand that file integrity is implemented using their national > standard algorithm. > > Thanks, Does it mean that every state can demand from Linux kernel to carrying crypto algorithms of their choice? Jordan ----- End forwarded message -----