From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Message-ID: <51097E54.2070008@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:11:00 +0400 From: Alexey Gladkov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130117 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kbd@lists.altlinux.org References: <51083519.7020807@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre OpenPGP: id=4CFFD434; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0xA45ABA544CFFD434 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [kbd] kbd and vlock -n functionality X-BeenThere: kbd@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Linux console tools development discussion List-Id: Linux console tools development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:12:00 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: 30.01.2013 13:54, Manuel Moraga wrote: > I'm using arch linux, but that shouldn't matter. It matters actually. > I'm using the > vlock-2.2.3-1 package. the one you have found is very old. It seems the old > vlock website is down, but you can find the git repo here: > http://repo.or.cz/w/vlock.git. It seems the fedora project used the legacy > vlock. This is not the case for other ditributions such as arch linus, > gentoo and ubuntu which all use the newer vlock2. For example here is a > manpage for vlock from ubuntu which has the -n option: > http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/hardy/man1/vlock.1.html In different distributions there are different versions of vlock. This happened because for long time vlock project was abandoned. ALTLinux and Fedora had same version of vlock. Some time ago, i merged altlinux's version. Later i merged patches from Fedora. This version is not a replacement for vlock-2... at least for now. Archlinux maintainer was wrong if he replaced vlock-2 by kbd-vlock. -- Rgrds, legion