From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS, 
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Message-ID: <4EA1F81D.3060504@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 02:54:21 +0400
From: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110906 Thunderbird/6.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kbd@lists.altlinux.org
References: <b4ac641f-87d0-440c-9509-13da9129c169@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <b4ac641f-87d0-440c-9509-13da9129c169@zmail07.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4a1pre
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [kbd] kbd: loadkeys -d doesn't work
X-BeenThere: kbd@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Linux console tools development discussion <kbd@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: Linux console tools development discussion <kbd.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/kbd>,
	<mailto:kbd-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/kbd>
List-Post: <mailto:kbd@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kbd-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/kbd>,
	<mailto:kbd-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:54:29 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/kbd/4EA1F81D.3060504@gmail.com/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/kbd/>

21.10.2011 18:56, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> I think it shouldn't read stdin in case of optd

But in your previous email to you, do exactly the same.
What has changed?

Why behavior when the file must be different from the standard input
handle ? I don't see any difference.

-- 
Rgrds, legion