From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Message-ID: <4D376BCE.6080502@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:55:10 +0300 From: Alexey Gladkov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9pre) Gecko/20100817 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1.3pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux console tools development discussion References: <20110118191635.GA14628@deepthought> In-Reply-To: <20110118191635.GA14628@deepthought> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [kbd] LatGrkCyr fonts X-BeenThere: kbd@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Linux console tools development discussion List-Id: Linux console tools development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:55:25 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: 18.01.2011 22:16, Ken Moffat wrote: > I've got a couple of fonts that I'm now calling LatGrkCyr, and I > wonder if there is any interest in including them ? Wow! Nice font. I will necessarily add it. > What I can't tell is whether the cyrillic or (12x22) greek letter > forms are "good enough" (the 8x16 greek were reviewed in July 2007). cyrillic is good enough for me. > Perhaps I should also mention that the iso02-12x22 font included > with kbd appears to be identical to the iso01-12x22, and has been > since it was first included. The original site for it had stopped > responding when I looked in August last year - that was a > disappointment, I'd hoped I could take the East European latin forms > from it. May be www.archive.org can help ? -- Rgrds, legion