From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Message-ID: <49EB5BF3.80309@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:14:27 +0400 From: Alexey Gladkov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081202 Thunderbird/2.0.0.18 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux console tools development discussion References: <49E7B8B5.5000302@gmail.com> <49E887B1.7020301@gmail.com> <20090414174549.GA4174@graeme> <49E5021C.5040703@gmail.com> <20090415135344.GA3881@graeme> <49E676DE.70200@gmail.com> <20090416154504.GA8180@graeme> <49E7B8B5.5000302@gmail.com> <20090417200140.GA28229@graeme> <49EB4A7C.5080006@gmail.com> <20090419165046.GA17623@graeme> In-Reply-To: <20090419165046.GA17623@graeme> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [kbd] =?utf-8?q?=5BPATCH=5D_loadkeys=3A_Auto-convert_=E2=80=9Ctra?= =?utf-8?q?ditional=E2=80=9D/Unicode_keysyms?= X-BeenThere: kbd@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Linux console tools development discussion List-Id: Linux console tools development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:14:51 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: 19.04.2009 20:50, Michael Schutte wrote: > I tested these: > > http://packages.debian.org/lenny/linux-image-2.6.26-2-686 > http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/base/linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic > http://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-image-2.6.29-1-686 > > I just checked the kernel patches for the last one: Only two of them > affect drivers/char, but they don’t seem interesting as far as our > problem is concerned. What’s your distro/kernel? I use ALTLinux. Kernel is: http://www.unsafe.ru/lakostis/RPMS/ALTLinux/kernel-2.6.28/repo/SRPMS.hasher/kernel-image-lks-wks-2.6.28-alt4.src.rpm Do not shy of domain name. :) > Could this be an architectural issue? I run only x86 machines here, > perhaps you use amd64 or something else entirely? (Then again, your > User-Agent header tells me you also run on i686.) Yes. i686 -- Rgrds, legion