From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Message-ID: <49184B3C.5090709@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:54:52 +0300 From: Alexey Gladkov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080717 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kbd@lists.altlinux.org References: <20081109124226.GA16538@graeme.homenet> In-Reply-To: <20081109124226.GA16538@graeme.homenet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [kbd] U+f000 and above X-BeenThere: kbd@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: Linux console tools development discussion List-Id: Linux console tools development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:55:02 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: Michael Schutte wrote: > Alexey, > > Do you agree with me that it would make sense to make loadkeys fail (or > at least warn the user) on U+xxxx keysym specifications >= 0xf000? I agree. This is a good idea. -- Rgrds, legion