From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eichi237@mailoo.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= <eichi237@mailoo.org>
To: kbd@lists.altlinux.org
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:14:17 +0200
Message-ID: <1928664.qHUog6ZA0u@seb-pc>
User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.9.9-1-ARCH; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; )
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Subject: [kbd] =?utf-8?q?_Include_B=C3=A9po_in_the_set_of_default_layouts?=
X-BeenThere: kbd@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Linux console tools development discussion <kbd@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: Linux console tools development discussion <kbd.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/kbd>,
	<mailto:kbd-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/kbd>
List-Post: <mailto:kbd@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kbd-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/kbd>,
	<mailto:kbd-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:14:35 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/kbd/1928664.qHUog6ZA0u@seb-pc/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/kbd/>

>>>> So, what do you think about this idea?
>>>
>>> I have no objections about it.
>>=20
>> How do you make decisions here? Anybody is responsible of keyboard l=
ayouts?
>
>At the moment, I support the code and keymaps, so I make the decisions=

>about it.
>
>> However, the archive which contains all the files are here:
>> http://download.tuxfamily.org/dvorak/keymaps/fr-dvorak-bepo-keymaps-=
1.0rc2.tgz
>
>I'll look at it in the near future.
>
>> P.-S.: In the fr-dvorak-bepo.map, a dev puts a comment:
>> =E2=80=9CCapsLock with '+eacute' doesn't work, nor with egrave, cced=
illa,
>> ecircumflex, agrave and guillemotleft/right : bug ?=E2=80=9D
>> Do you know how to resolve this problem? It=E2=80=99s better to chec=
k if everything=20
> > is ok before including it, isn=E2=80=99t it?
>
> Yes. I'll look in the parser for this.

Do you have any news? It seems B=C3=A9po isn=E2=80=99t included at the =
moment in the main=20
tree.

Thanks by advance,

S=C3=A9bastien.