From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Message-ID:Date:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:To:From:Subject; bh=1frqwENvim7qkBLMasKBKMUWfF9i0QMXGAw4zjbSiBU=; b=IsWR6vR4MPIE4MkxgxT9L6vBjfXj3qzfeTmhR80W4tAeLpDU4nH9eWaBhcn1axaQcROb1+4i3+aL4W7nULVdPVb/NrtgUQ+BLatb6bAma8hy3tz50lkN6uvMeJXapIwv; From: gBopHuk_alt To: hardware@lists.altlinux.org In-Reply-To: <50BC8551.8000704@gmail.com> References: <1354481997.24727.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1354530634.25382.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <50BC8551.8000704@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:10:18 +0400 Message-ID: <1354554618.30108.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-alt2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Subject: Re: [Hardware] SDA Write cache doesn't support DPO or FUA X-BeenThere: hardware@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: hardware@lists.altlinux.org List-Id: ALT Linux hardware support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:05:17 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: В Пнд, 03/12/2012 в 14:56 +0400, Alexey Borisenkov пишет: > По моим наблюдениям NCQ плохо уживается с CFQ, который является > планировщиком по умолчанию. А кто такие NCQ и CFQ? И где глянуть что у меня стоит или включено?