From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Anton Farygin Organization: ALT Linux Ltd. Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:02:37 +0400 User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Message-Id: References: <431ECEA6.5010107@altlinux.ru> To: devel@altlinux.ru MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [devel] Re: QA: =?koi8-r?b?1dbFIMnE1dQg0sHCz9TZIM7BxCDXzsXE0sXOycXN?= smartpm? X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 12:04:47 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 14:27:34 +0300, Andrei Bulava wrote: > Hi all! > > Даже мне, фанату apt-rpm в течение последних > четырёх лет, и то не кажется, что всё > нижеизложенное - marketing bullshit (за > исключением фразы "newer tools like yum" ;-) ) > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Fedora.us Status, Warning to FC3 APT Users! Date: Tue, 06 Sep > 2005 18:16:44 -1000 From: Warren Togami Reply-To: > fedora-list@redhat.com > To: fedora-announce-list@redhat.com > > > > The Fedora Project recommends that users migrate away from apt to newer > tools like yum or smartpm. Even upstream Conectiva has given up on apt, > instead worked on their new client smartpm rewritten from scratch. Apt-rpm > has bugs (virtual provides bugs like #164601) and missing functionality > (like multilib) that may never be fixed, making it impossible to support > for the Fedora Project. > > Yum and smartpm have the direct benefit of being able to use the repodata > on official Fedora Project mirrors. Extras has "yumex" and "kyum" > graphical user interfaces available, while smartpm has its own GUI > interface. (Hmm... any volunteers to put smartpm into Extras?) > ---------------------------------- > > Вопрос smartpm у нас уже поднимался, > упомянутые выше по тексту баги apt-rpm, virtual > provides и multilib/biarch, тоже в данный момент > стоят поперёк дороги Сизифа, так что "any > volunteers to put smartpm into Sisyphus"? Ну собственно собрать smartrpm никто не запрещает. А дальше будет видно. Можно точно так же yum собрать. А еще можно зафиксить apt (в очередной раз) ;-) Rgds, Rider