Hello!

Спасибо! А есть примеры пакетов, с которыми можно проверить?

On Fri, 31 Jan 2020, Aleksei Nikiforov wrote:

> ---
>  apt/apt-pkg/rpm/rpmpm.cc | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/apt/apt-pkg/rpm/rpmpm.cc b/apt/apt-pkg/rpm/rpmpm.cc
> index e00630f..4bca9f4 100644
> --- a/apt/apt-pkg/rpm/rpmpm.cc
> +++ b/apt/apt-pkg/rpm/rpmpm.cc
> @@ -81,7 +81,12 @@ std::string rpm_name_conversion(const pkgCache::PkgIterator &Pkg)
>  #if RPM_VERSION >= 0x040202
>     // This is needed for removal to work on multilib packages, but old
>     // rpm versions don't support name.arch in RPMDBI_LABEL, oh well...
> -   Name = Name + "." + Pkg.CurrentVer().Arch();
> +   // Note: some 3rd-party packages may still miss arch, so only use it
> +   // when it's present
> +   if (Pkg.CurrentVer().Arch() != nullptr)
> +   {
> +      Name = Name + "." + Pkg.CurrentVer().Arch();
> +   }
>  #endif
>  
>     return Name;
> -- 
> 2.24.1


-- 
Best regards,
Ivan