From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:10:52 +0300 (MSK) From: Ivan Zakharyaschev To: ALT Linux Team development discussions In-Reply-To: <871efa99-89b0-00b3-72ec-460187275626@basealt.ru> Message-ID: References: <871efa99-89b0-00b3-72ec-460187275626@basealt.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="1807885841-1524937188-1553519452=:1228" Subject: Re: [devel] =?koi8-r?b?ZGlzdHRhZyDJIHJlYnVpbGQ=?= X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:10:52 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --1807885841-1524937188-1553519452=:1228 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Anton Farygin wrote: > Вопрос в первую очередь к тем, кто придумывал disttag. > > Хотелось бы понять, что будет с пакетом после того, как у нас появится p9 (на > базе sisyphus) и этому пакету сделаем rebuild в task'е. > > Ведь sisyphus-<таск> будет точно больше, чем p9-<таск>. > > Соответственно у нас отломается обновление этого пакета ? > > Или я ошибаюсь ? Я сконцентрировался на rpm-4.0.4 и пока реализовал такую штуку. Пердполагаю перенести на rpm-4.13 и собирать в p9 rpm с %def_enable default_priority_distbranch $ rpm -qp /ALT/c7.1/x86_64/RPMS.classic/rpm-4.0.4-alt100.77.M70P.3.M70C.2.x86_64.rpm --lastchange * Чт мар 14 2019 Ivan Zakharyaschev 4.0.4-alt100.77.M70P.3.M70C.2 Merged 4.0.4-alt101.M80P.5.2 into c7.1: [rpm] - Changes in what is considered "newer" by rpm -U pertaining to disttag comparison. (On the whole, to determine which package is "newer", first, the EVRs are compared, then the branch prefixes of the disttags if the disttags are present, and then the buildtimes.) The comparison of the disttags: + (new!) If a disttag contains no + separator (old format), the branch prefix is assumed to be empty (and hence "older" than any other branch prefix). + (new!) If the branch prefix of a disttag is equal to %_priority_distbranch (and it is not empty), then it is "newer" than any other ones. + (as before, since 4.0.4-alt101.M80P.5) The branch prefixes of disttags are ordered lexicographically. - (disabled in this release; %if_enabled default_priority_distbranch) Give a default value to %_priority_distbranch based on the disttag when this package is built (the prefix before +). -- Best regards, Ivan --1807885841-1524937188-1553519452=:1228--