From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stalker@altlinux.ru>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.5
Message-ID: <53A09CB2.8070909@altlinux.ru>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:53:22 +0400
From: Anton Gorlov <stalker@altlinux.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
References: <201406171306.47361.asy@altlinux.ru>	<20140617095054.GN9798@osdn.org.ua>
	<201406172231.22520.asy@altlinux.ru>
In-Reply-To: <201406172231.22520.asy@altlinux.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Authenticated-As: stalker@locum.ru 
Subject: Re: [devel]
 =?koi8-r?b?+sHXydPJzc/T1NggbWFyaWFkYi1zZXJ2ZXIgySBzZWxp?=
 =?koi8-r?b?bnV4LXBvbGljeSDP1CBsaWJYMTEgKCDexdLF2iBsaWJjYWlybywgPT91dGYt?=
 =?koi8-r?b?OD9iPzBML1F2dEdGMEw3UXR0QzE/PSk=?=
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:36:48 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/53A09CB2.8070909@altlinux.ru/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>

Лучше таки повесить баг

17.06.2014 22:31, Sergey Y. Afonin пишет:
> On Tuesday 17 June 2014, Michael Shigorin wrote:
>
>> Скорее лишнее в policycoreutils, на который есть лишние зависимости.
>  
> Так что, баг вешать, или "само рассосётся" ? :-)
>