From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sBSqdZ2Yr6/aGXBtJjrKB2MEruK4x8lQKKQJFPQ801g=; b=0tECINjdETLodMqt+lvp4uvUkEKT7tlyD/r+TVZFk7Sv9igXZl9dNCfSkdw0Rd4Eif 03alS4Li7noWPJd3XH+LFO/kkoVitl4VWrBWI8aIyfpqPx0GcCqq9PduGGoYoFso0CAp CCuGAyBhmS7WN2ZljWGmFpNGPWWQNrTdOAUM4VaLVdDn/z8dniDYo818EzJfIMl5WOJT B3pysOZuMQepdxQ5nzCbiJGThif5zKZsmzDYTk/uiYw3tTp1TigT22nHXj0NYe0bjbtL b89EaHrmgqtp+55vLs1Iz5Na+GeVvCR76ZK+hAqN1UNzPcXTi02uH8dRXCpx1N29GYP3 4XnQ== X-Received: by 10.14.183.73 with SMTP id p49mr1588081eem.113.1389702309301; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:25:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52D52CA3.2020108@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:25:07 +0200 From: Viacheslav Dubrovskyi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ALT Linux Team development discussions References: <52D50FA5.9090207@gmail.com> <20140114111907.GA12679@altlinux.org> In-Reply-To: <20140114111907.GA12679@altlinux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [devel] =?koi8-r?b?cGtnY29uZmlnLnByb3YgzsUg0NLP0NXTy8HF1CAiKyIg?= =?koi8-r?b?1yDJzcXOySDCycLMyc/UxcvJPw==?= X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:25:20 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: 14.01.2014 13:19, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:21:25PM +0200, Viacheslav Dubrovskyi wrote: >> Здравствуйте. >> >> Согласно https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29716 >> решил обновить пакет directfb до последней >> стабильной версии 1.7.1 >> >> Во время сборки получил вот такую ошибку: >> >> Processing files: libdirectfb-devel-1.7.1-alt1 >> Finding Provides (using /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides) >> Executing: /bin/sh -e /usr/src/tmp/rpm-tmp.vEILLZ >> find-provides: running scripts >> (alternatives,debuginfo,lib,pam,perl,pkgconfig,python,shell) >> pkgconfig.prov: ERROR: >> /usr/src/tmp/directfb-buildroot/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/++dfb.pc: invalid >> pkg-config output: ++dfb = 1.7.1 >> find-provides: ERROR: /usr/lib/rpm/pkgconfig.prov failed >> error: /bin/sh failed >> error: Failed to find Provides >> >> Содержимое /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/++dfb.pc : >> >> prefix=/usr >> exec_prefix=/usr >> libdir=/usr/lib64 >> includedir=/usr/include >> >> Name: ++DFB > Имя не должно начинаться со знака "+". Удаление ++ из Name: ++DFB не решает проблему. Ему не нравится имя файла ++dfb.pc [builder@localhost ~]$ /usr/lib/rpm/pkgconfig.prov /usr/src/tmp/directfb-buildroot/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/++dfb.pc pkgconfig.prov: ERROR: /usr/src/tmp/directfb-buildroot/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/++dfb.pc: invalid pkg-config output: ++dfb = 1.7.1 [builder@localhost ~]$ cat /usr/src/tmp/directfb-buildroot/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/++dfb.pc prefix=/usr exec_prefix=/usr libdir=/usr/lib64 includedir=/usr/include Name: DFB Description: C++ binding for DirectFB Version: 1.7.1 Requires: directfb Libs: -l++dfb Cflags: -I/usr/include/++dfb -- WBR, Viacheslav Dubrovskyi