From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FotHzvrU3pwN69K16RjOb4Hivxu1YkrjyhhdF46Hvg4=; b=WwLOW+oY8FNeAeN9s+P8SSP+d+RWT7VmtpqJHyDTRpqsJfdr9pf5MHkZ/SOU0mCW8d P3gmUqZuG9Zg972UvkFTNPXqcymiEv/L3tTdx9Sd0bqoHAXN1q97W3TxzjJsUq0oLOyA ZRyw54YNDom0nlU8qm4fzwBc8w+aF/Dv+y85rvfkhas3u0Gg7SozribkBl9ceqIElU0f rVD1hOql7jMHHAfe2dSzW97/lAtMDfuie21YfIpZDMBRKWrUXsYmEK4dX/ukEwcjHz4h nPyDeZ25eaafUEPUwuV4hyR3ufoj46A5QagVskIgSdaeJmaQENXHM9v8wn9kZTs9+Kzx tdGg== X-Received: by 10.180.74.131 with SMTP id t3mr30622100wiv.26.1361350893401; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:01:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <512490CC.7000307@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:01:00 +0200 From: Viacheslav Dubrovskyi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130127 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: devel@lists.altlinux.org References: <20130220013614.GA26049@mw.mithraen.ru> <51247D51.5040003@gmail.com> <51248CDA.5070104@kemsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <51248CDA.5070104@kemsu.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [devel] =?koi8-r?b?3tTPINPMz83BzM/T2CDXIFNOTVA/?= X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:01:39 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: 20.02.2013 10:44, REAL пишет: > 20.02.2013 13:37, Viacheslav Dubrovskyi пишет: >>> Что изменилось? >> Ну новая версия была. Можно пример ошибки? > > Лично у меня вот такое приехало: > > checking whether to try to build SNMP support... yes > checking for net-snmp-config... net-snmp-config > checking net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h usability... yes > checking net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h presence... yes > checking for net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h... yes > checking for register_mib... no > checking for SNMP support... no (see config.log for errors) > configure: error: SNMP support was requested, but unavailable > error: Bad exit status from /usr/src/tmp/rpm-tmp.96239 (%build) > > > Это lustre, он у меня в гите, попробуйте. Ну или из > /gears/l/lustre.git возьмите. > configure:18570: checking for register_mib configure:18627: x86_64-alt-linux-gcc -o conftest -pipe -Wall -g -O2 -I/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/lustre-1.8.4/lnet/include -I/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/lustre-1.8.4/lnet/include -I/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/lustre-1.8.4/lustre/include -DNETSNMP_ENABLE_IPV6 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -g -O2 -Ulinux -Dlinux=linux -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fstack-protector -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/lib64/perl5/CORE -I/usr/include conftest.c -lnetsnmpmibs -lnl -lsensors -ldl -lnetsnmpagent -lwrap -Wl,-E -lnetsnmp -lrt -lssl -lssl -lcrypto -lm -lcrypto -lwrap >&5 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lnl collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Похоже это из-за пляски с libnl. Почему-то переехав на libnl3 оставили libnl-devel который работать не хочет и в системе оказывается [builder@builder ~]$ rpm -qa | grep libnl libnl1-1.1-alt3 libnl3-utils-3.2.21-alt2 libnl3-3.2.21-alt2 libnl-devel-3.2.21-alt2 -- WBR, Viacheslav Dubrovskyi