From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <Shakirov@cg.ru>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
Message-ID: <4F8D6AF5.2020507@cg.ru>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:07:01 +0400
From: Lenar Shakirov <shakirov@cg.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru;
	rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
References: <20120416120628.GA28472@ssh.git.altlinux.org>	<4F8C0D0F.7070207@cg.ru>
	<4F8D4EB5.6070907@altlinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F8D4EB5.6070907@altlinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Apr 2012 13:07:01.0860 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[FA9AC240:01CD1C9A]
Subject: Re: [devel] [#69737] t6 FAILED patchage.git=0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:07:13 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/4F8D6AF5.2020507@cg.ru/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>

17.04.2012 15:06, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy пишет:
> On 04/16/2012 12:14 PM, Lenar Shakirov wrote:
>> 16.04.2012 16:06, Girar Builder robot пишет:
>>> http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/69737/logs/events.1.1.log
>> <skip>
>>> *** source package version is either the same or older than existing
>>> patchage 0.4.2-alt2.qa1 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1
>>> *** binary package version is either the same or older than existing
>>> patchage 0.4.2-alt2.qa1 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1
>>> *** binary package version is either the same or older than existing
>>> patchage 0.4.2-alt2.qa1 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1
>>> *** binary package version is either the same or older than existing
>>> patchage-debuginfo 0.4.2-alt2.qa1 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1
>>> *** binary package version is either the same or older than existing
>>> patchage-debuginfo 0.4.2-alt2.qa1 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1
>>> 2012-Apr-16 16:06:27 :: version check FAILED
>>> 2012-Apr-16 16:06:27 :: task #69737 for t6 FAILED
>>
>> Как быть в этой ситуации?
>>
>> Пробовал так:
>> > 2012-Apr-16 15:59:02 :: patchage.git 0.4.2-alt2.qa2: release name
>> alt2.qa2 does not contain *.M60T.* suffix
>>
>> Не заливать же 0.4.2-alt3.M60T.1, который будет больше версии в Сизифе
>> (0.4.2-alt3).
>>
>> И почему сообщение "binary package version is either the same or older
>> than existing"
>> повторяется дважды? Это из-за проверки для двух архитектур?
>>
>>
>
> Мне кажется, что 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.2 или 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.2.qa1 .
> Оба варианта больше, чем 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1 и меньше 0.4.2-alt3 и оба
> имеют суффикс.

Я не совсем понял ваш совет, ведь в T6 версия 0.4.2-alt2.qa1, а "q" > "M"


-- 
С уважением, инженер отдела ИИС ООО «Центр»
Шакиров Ленар Наилевич
shakirov@cg.ru
(843) 533-88-14

Российская Федерация
Казань, ул. Зинина, 3а
420029, а/я 81

http://www.cg.ru/