From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4F8D4EB5.6070907@altlinux.org> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:06:29 +0000 From: Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120225 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: devel@lists.altlinux.org References: <20120416120628.GA28472@ssh.git.altlinux.org> <4F8C0D0F.7070207@cg.ru> In-Reply-To: <4F8C0D0F.7070207@cg.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [devel] [#69737] t6 FAILED patchage.git=0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1 X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:05:26 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 04/16/2012 12:14 PM, Lenar Shakirov wrote: > 16.04.2012 16:06, Girar Builder robot пишет: >> http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/69737/logs/events.1.1.log > >> *** source package version is either the same or older than existing >> patchage 0.4.2-alt2.qa1 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1 >> *** binary package version is either the same or older than existing >> patchage 0.4.2-alt2.qa1 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1 >> *** binary package version is either the same or older than existing >> patchage 0.4.2-alt2.qa1 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1 >> *** binary package version is either the same or older than existing >> patchage-debuginfo 0.4.2-alt2.qa1 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1 >> *** binary package version is either the same or older than existing >> patchage-debuginfo 0.4.2-alt2.qa1 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1 >> 2012-Apr-16 16:06:27 :: version check FAILED >> 2012-Apr-16 16:06:27 :: task #69737 for t6 FAILED > > Как быть в этой ситуации? > > Пробовал так: > > 2012-Apr-16 15:59:02 :: patchage.git 0.4.2-alt2.qa2: release name > alt2.qa2 does not contain *.M60T.* suffix > > Не заливать же 0.4.2-alt3.M60T.1, который будет больше версии в Сизифе > (0.4.2-alt3). > > И почему сообщение "binary package version is either the same or older > than existing" > повторяется дважды? Это из-за проверки для двух архитектур? > > Мне кажется, что 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.2 или 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.2.qa1 . Оба варианта больше, чем 0.4.2-alt2.M60T.1 и меньше 0.4.2-alt3 и оба имеют суффикс. -- glebfm Глеб Фотенгауэр-Малиновский