From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rider@altlinux.com>
Message-ID: <4ACC6C69.9020404@altlinux.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:24:41 +0400
From: Anton Farygin <rider@altlinux.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091003 Thunderbird/3.0pre
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
References: <20091005152759.GX31772@osdn.org.ua>	<d0dba48d0910062207h50a4635dye6508ac6ed2a055b@mail.gmail.com>	<20091007093520.GI31772@osdn.org.ua>
	<20091007095712.GC8852@snowwhite.immo>
In-Reply-To: <20091007095712.GC8852@snowwhite.immo>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [devel] =?utf-8?b?W0pUXSDRg9C/0L7QvNC40L3QsNC90LjRjyB0YXNrJ9C+?=
	=?utf-8?b?0LI=?=
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:25:15 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/4ACC6C69.9020404@altlinux.com/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>

07.10.2009 13:57, Konstantin Pavlov пишет:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:35:20PM +0300, Michael Shigorin wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 05:07:24AM +0000, Anton Protopopov wrote:
>>>> А почему kernel-modules-virtualbox не собирается для ovz-rhel?
>>>> Проблем пока не обнаружено.
>>> См. #13899
>>
>> Спасибо.
>>
>> 2 devel: как бы договориться удобно ссылаться на таски,
>> чтоб не путать с уже устоявшейся конвенцией для багов...
>> может, "task#13899"?
>
> t13899?

тогда уж !13899