From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Message-ID: <493628E4.9040004@tightvnc.com> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:36:20 +0600 From: Constantin Kaplinsky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denis Medvedev References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:58:33 +0300 Cc: ALT Linux Team development discussions , vnc-tight-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [devel] /usr/bin/vncserver X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:36:45 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hello Denis, >>>>> Denis Medvedev wrote: > what do you think about the contents and setup functions of the file > /usr/bin/vncserver? Should config values be moved to a different > place, like /etc/vncserver.conf from that file? Yes, sure, that would be much better. This (and much more) has been already done in Debian GNU/Linux, and I plan to merge their patches back to the TightVNC codebase. -- With Best Wishes, Constantin