From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <440166B8.6000201@altlinux.org> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:28:40 +0300 From: Alexey Rusakov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050815 Thunderbird/1.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ALT Devel discussion list References: <20060225210817.GA25959@basalt.office.altlinux.org> <20060225230249.GB27302@basalt.office.altlinux.org> In-Reply-To: <20060225230249.GB27302@basalt.office.altlinux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [devel] Q: urw-fonts deps X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:28:56 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Dmitry V. Levin wrote: >Кто-нибудь знает, откуда такие странные зависимости на urw-fonts? > >On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:08:17AM +0300, QA Team Robot wrote: > > >>libgnomeprint2#2.12.1-alt1.1 urw-fonts (>= 2.0-alt22) >> Не знаю, но скорее всего, ничего страшного не случится. Собрал без этой зависимости, немного посмотрю и отправлю в /i/S. -- Alexey "Ktirf" Rusakov