From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <42584538.50809@altlinux.ru> Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 01:12:24 +0400 From: Alexey Rusakov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050202 Thunderbird/1.0 Mnenhy/0.7 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ALT Devel discussion list Subject: Re: [devel] Re: xchm vs. Gtk+2 References: <42583DF5.7050701@altlinux.ru> <20050409210833.GH5325@osdn.org.ua> In-Reply-To: <20050409210833.GH5325@osdn.org.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: devel@altlinux.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Devel discussion list List-Id: ALT Devel discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 21:12:28 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Michael Shigorin wrote: >On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:41:25AM +0400, Alexey Rusakov wrote: > > >>Мне кажется, целесообразно перевести xchm на новые рельсы. >>Другие мнения есть? >> >> > >Хвалили archmage. > > Так. Другие мнения насчёт xchm есть? ;) -- Alexey "Ktirf" Rusakov