From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3BC6DB3F.7020308@altlinux.ru> From: Stanislav Ievlev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010927 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: devel@linux.iplabs.ru Subject: Re: [devel] Fw: FWD: Announce: many virtual servers on a single box References: <20011012114031.C17640@pc152.belcaf.minsk.by> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: devel-admin@linux.iplabs.ru Errors-To: devel-admin@linux.iplabs.ru X-BeenThere: devel@linux.iplabs.ru X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: devel@linux.iplabs.ru List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: ALT Linux Team Developers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Original-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:59:59 +0400 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:59:59 +0400 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Alexander Bokovoy wrote: >Двойной форвард, но он стоит того. > >2Sergey Bolshakov: интересно, можно ли ее использовать с BTE? > >2Goldhead: Твои мысли по интеграции с нашим 2.4? > Мощная, судя по описанию, штука. > > >----- Forwarded message from Mike Panetta ----- > >Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:10:21 -0700 >From: Mike Panetta >To: devel@applianceware.com, aw@belcaf.com >Subject: FWD: Announce: many virtual servers on a single box > >I found this pretty intresting, dont know immediately >what it may be good for, but it may be usefull in the >future. > >Mike > >----- Forwarded message from Jacques Gelinas ----- > >From: Jacques Gelinas >Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 01:06:32 -0500 >To: Linux kernel list >Subject: Announce: many virtual servers on a single box >Precedence: bulk >X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >X-UIDL: ]7/!!g03!!_%N"!0;4"! > >I have enhanced the kernel to allow several independant virtual servers >running on the same box (sharing the same kernel as well). I introduced >2 new system calls (new_s_context and set_ipv4root) allowing >much independance between the virtual servers. Virtual servers are >independant enough and "real" enough that you can supply root password >to the virtual server administrators. Virtual servers may be described > >-May run various network services, binding to the same ports > without special configuration. Services are started normally (sysv script, whatever > the distro you are using). > >-Have independant process list, so they can't interfere. You can't see or send > signal to process in other vservers (or the root server) > >-I have also modified the capability system a little, so those virtual server > administrators can't take over the machine. I have introduced a per-process > capability ceiling, inherited by sub-process. Even setuid program can't grab > more capabilities.. > >-Update packages normally, create users, Use any admin procedure/tool > >Maybe such a project has already been done. Anyway, I have written a lot >of documentation about it (how it works, pro and con and so on). It works >on top of 2.4.10 or 2.4.11 (probably anything). I would really like to get >some comments. > >You can find all the documentation and packages at >http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc > >All this is GPL... > >--------------------------------------------------------- >Jacques Gelinas >vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed! >http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > >----- End forwarded message ----- > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@linux.iplabs.ru http://www.logic.ru/mailman/listinfo/devel