From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ldv@altlinux.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:32:09 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Devel discussion list <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20201117163208.GD9705@altlinux.org>
References: <20201117161430.GA1509675@gyle.mskdc.altlinux.org>
 <338530691.1788863.1605629960738.JavaMail.zimbra@taf.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <338530691.1788863.1605629960738.JavaMail.zimbra@taf.ru>
Subject: Re: [devel] [#261932] [test-only] p8 FAILED
 postgresql.git=11.10-alt0.M80P.1 postgresql.git=9.5.24-alt0.M80P.1 ...
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
 <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
 <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:32:09 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20201117163208.GD9705@altlinux.org/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>

Добрый день,

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:19:20AM +0800, alexei@taf.ru wrote:
> Добрый день!
> 
> ----- Исходное сообщение -----
> > От: "Girar awaiter (taf)" <girar-builder@altlinux.org>
> > Кому: "taf" <taf@altlinux.org>
> > Копия: girar-builder-p8@altlinux.org, sisyphus-incominger@lists.altlinux.org
> > Отправленные: Среда, 18 Ноябрь 2020 г 0:14:31
> > Тема: [#261932] [test-only] p8 FAILED postgresql.git=11.10-alt0.M80P.1 postgresql.git=9.5.24-alt0.M80P.1 ...
> 
> > http://git.altlinux.org/tasks/261932/logs/events.1.1.log
> > 
> 
> >	NEW duplicate provides detected:
> > Provide:                      Providers:
> > libecpg.so.6                  libecpg6.10 libecpg6.11 libecpg6.11-1C libecpg6.12
> > libecpg6.3 libecpg6.5 libecpg6.6 libecpg6.7 libecpg6.8
> > libecpg.so.6()(64bit)         libecpg6.10 libecpg6.11 libecpg6.11-1C libecpg6.12
> > libecpg6.3 libecpg6.5 libecpg6.6 libecpg6.7 libecpg6.8
> > libecpg_compat.so.3           libecpg6.10 libecpg6.11 libecpg6.11-1C libecpg6.12
> > libecpg6.3 libecpg6.5 libecpg6.6 libecpg6.7 libecpg6.8
> > libecpg_compat.so.3()(64bit)  libecpg6.10 libecpg6.11 libecpg6.11-1C libecpg6.12
> > libecpg6.3 libecpg6.5 libecpg6.6 libecpg6.7 libecpg6.8
> > libpgtypes.so.3               libecpg6.10 libecpg6.11 libecpg6.11-1C libecpg6.12
> > libecpg6.3 libecpg6.5 libecpg6.6 libecpg6.7 libecpg6.8
> > libpgtypes.so.3()(64bit)      libecpg6.10 libecpg6.11 libecpg6.11-1C libecpg6.12
> > libecpg6.3 libecpg6.5 libecpg6.6 libecpg6.7 libecpg6.8
> > libpq.so.5                    libpq5.10 libpq5.11 libpq5.11-1C libpq5.12
> > libpq5.4 libpq5.6 libpq5.7 libpq5.8 libpq5.9
> > libpq.so.5()(64bit)           libpq5.10 libpq5.11 libpq5.11-1C libpq5.12
> > libpq5.4 libpq5.6 libpq5.7 libpq5.8 libpq5.9
> >	old duplicate provides resolved:
> > Provide:                      Providers:
> > libecpg.so.6                  libecpg6.10 libecpg6.11 libecpg6.11-1C libecpg6.12
> > libecpg6.3 libecpg6.5 libecpg6.6 libecpg6.7 libecpg6.8
> > libecpg.so.6()(64bit)         libecpg6.10 libecpg6.11 libecpg6.11-1C libecpg6.12
> > libecpg6.3 libecpg6.5 libecpg6.6 libecpg6.7 libecpg6.8
> > libecpg_compat.so.3           libecpg6.10 libecpg6.11 libecpg6.11-1C libecpg6.12
> > libecpg6.3 libecpg6.5 libecpg6.6 libecpg6.7 libecpg6.8
> > libecpg_compat.so.3()(64bit)  libecpg6.10 libecpg6.11 libecpg6.11-1C libecpg6.12
> > libecpg6.3 libecpg6.5 libecpg6.6 libecpg6.7 libecpg6.8
> > libpgtypes.so.3               libecpg6.10 libecpg6.11 libecpg6.11-1C libecpg6.12
> > libecpg6.3 libecpg6.5 libecpg6.6 libecpg6.7 libecpg6.8
> > libpgtypes.so.3()(64bit)      libecpg6.10 libecpg6.11 libecpg6.11-1C libecpg6.12
> > libecpg6.3 libecpg6.5 libecpg6.6 libecpg6.7 libecpg6.8
> > libpq.so.5                    libpq5.10 libpq5.11 libpq5.11-1C libpq5.12
> > libpq5.4 libpq5.6 libpq5.7 libpq5.8 libpq5.9
> > libpq.so.5()(64bit)           libpq5.10 libpq5.11 libpq5.11-1C libpq5.12
> > libpq5.4 libpq5.6 libpq5.7 libpq5.8 libpq5.9
> > 2020-Nov-17 16:14:30 :: duplicate provides: i586 +4 -4 =2464, x86_64 +4 -4
> > =2465; check FAILED
> > 2020-Nov-17 16:14:30 :: task #261932 for p8 FAILED
> 
> На сколько оправдано включение проверки на duplicate provides для p8?

Интересный вопрос, конечно.  Проверка была включена для всех.
Вероятно, для p8 и более старых репозиториев достаточно было
один раз увидеть, как там всё было плохо по сравнению с Сизифом:
sisyphus: 109, p9: 1176, p8: 2464.
Давайте пока понизим статус отрицательного заключения этой проверки
в p8 с ошибки до предупреждения.


-- 
ldv