From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on sa.local.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 From: Sergey Afonin To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 12:30:03 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748) References: <20171004044335.GA2470@gyle.altlinux.org> <20171004210453.GB8112@imap.altlinux.org> <7c7f55b1-f7d7-5cba-bc4e-05a8a5595038@basealt.ru> In-Reply-To: <7c7f55b1-f7d7-5cba-bc4e-05a8a5595038@basealt.ru> X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201710051230.03705.asy@altlinux.org> Subject: Re: [devel] [cyber] I: Sisyphus-20171004 packages: +2! -3 +59 (17922) X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 08:30:15 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Thursday 05 October 2017, Anton Farygin wrote: > это лучше  tcpdump + wireshark ? А зачем tcpdump в ситуации, когда "+ wireshark"? У последнего есть tshark. tcpdump, разве что, привычнее. -- С уважением, Сергей Афонин.