From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <vseleznv@cs.msu.ru>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on
 sa.local.altlinux.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham
 autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=altlinux.org; s=dkim; h=Subject:Sender:In-Reply-To:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:To:
 From:Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:
 Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:
 List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=3thyGIROBRNcuam7yrW+con0b/eK9fyYI+g4M0+qYpk=; b=lBdEHGUxt2BvMzHVOhDxAsaI35
 QBy8N5hKm7VI6uPf5U9gFRBA0BafEnCEiaMuvIW556grqWyR529zwat9NIJrQxpnzSELvbcEUjYkL
 fTEU2aofshJ2/6idISVh7035hQWo9ol9xBWvhlAHh0M0x7GzbK8KszAweICTqdfXsG0Actefuq2zY
 tq87lr7NSDGD59BpVOuEKHPq0UAPZ8eaYfJhcjKy4WuBofOSjO3parsmpGI3WX1ZSA4dKDPdJQ4gv
 OelKnoZQ8Id2AnUuwcRugdmkVuYK45/fFGS+pQ9Kpd1B7Fd0Fi2jpH4C9v+vAiEfNSu8WT8Rp7SnW
 Oeyq18PQ==;
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:00:35 +0300
From: "Vladimir D. Seleznev" <vseleznv@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20161027150035.GB5537@portlab>
References: <20161026201212.GA31374@gyle.altlinux.org>
 <20161026210839.GA28676@imap.altlinux.org>
 <11a2545c-16c6-11e1-ea77-df00d6740d7b@etersoft.ru>
 <20161026225404.GA29914@imap.altlinux.org>
 <20161027103522.GA7445@glebfm.cloud.tilaa.com>
 <20161027135527.GA10287@imap.altlinux.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20161027135527.GA10287@imap.altlinux.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6 (2015-08-30)
Sender: vseleznv@cs.msu.ru
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 93.191.18.90
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: vseleznv@cs.msu.ru
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.cs.msu.ru)
Subject: Re: [devel] [#171101] FAILED (try 3) finlib.git=2.35.2-alt1
 manatee-open.git=2.139.3-alt3 ...
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
 <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
 <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:00:39 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20161027150035.GB5537@portlab/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 04:55:27PM +0300, Kirill Maslinsky wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 01:35:22PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Если пакет x86_64-only, то и пакеты от него зависимые могут быть только
> > такие же -- x86_64-only.
> 
> То есть полностью написанный на питоне noarch-пакет bonito2-open следует 
> сделать x86_64 only, поскольку он зависит от x86_64 only manatee-open?
> 
> Мне это решение казалось каким-то неаккуратным, но если оно логически
> верное, то так я и сделаю. 

Если manatee-open может потом стать не только x86_64-only, то хорошо бы
при этом сделать bonito2-open доступным для тех же архитектур, для
которых доступен manatee-open.

-- 
   С уважением,
   Владимир Селезнев