From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on sa.local.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: "Sergey Y. Afonin" Organization: Kraft-S JSC To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 15:41:48 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748) References: <20160224221231.GA13872@dad.imath.kiev.ua> <20160225153854.GE1119@imap.altlinux.org> <20160225155148.GG11412@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6.fortress> In-Reply-To: <20160225155148.GG11412@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6.fortress> X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201602271541.48994.asy@altlinux.ru> Subject: Re: [devel] Q: what about xulrunner-devel? X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:41:57 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Thursday 25 February 2016, Alexey Gladkov wrote: > > > Лучше уж у нас вернуть firefox-devel > > > > Как вариант. > > cas@ уже собирает xulrunner. Пожелаем ему удачи. Так не лучше ли сейчас понять, который вариант предпочтительнее ? А то про mozilla-plugin-java-1.8.0 как раз спросить хотелось... -- С уважением, Сергей Афонин