From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <boyarsh@altlinux.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:01:03 +0400
From: "Anton V. Boyarshinov" <boyarsh@altlinux.org>
To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
Message-ID: <20140326140103.4afbc466@table.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <53326084.4040601@kemsu.ru>
References: <53326084.4040601@kemsu.ru>
Organization: ALT Linux
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.21; x86_64-alt-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: real@kemsu.ru
Subject: Re: [devel] [cyber] I: Sisyphus-20140326 packages: +2! -4 +64
 (15000)
X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions <devel.lists.altlinux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/options/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.altlinux.org/pipermail/devel>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@lists.altlinux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.altlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>,
	<mailto:devel-request@lists.altlinux.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:02:04 -0000
Archived-At: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/20140326140103.4afbc466@table.localdomain/>
List-Archive: <http://lore.altlinux.org/devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:devel@altlinux.org>

Привет

> 4 REMOVED packages
> kernel-modules-alx-std-def      20130405-alt1.199201.2
> kernel-modules-alx-std-pae      20130405-alt1.199201.2
> 
> Почему?
Есть мнение (в частности у led@), что внутриядерный alx в 3.10 не хуже
отдельного. Возможно, это мнение неправильное, если есть аргументы в
пользу отдельного alx, я его соберу.