From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on sa.int.altlinux.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 From: "Sergey Y. Afonin" To: ALT Linux Team development discussions Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:59:19 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201207031559.19493.asy@altlinux.ru> Subject: [devel] =?koi8-r?b?dW5tZXQg0M8g0NLJ3snOxSDP1NPV1NPU19XA3cXHzyDG?= =?koi8-r?b?wcrMwS3T09nMy8k=?= X-BeenThere: devel@lists.altlinux.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Id: ALT Linux Team development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:59:34 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Приветствую. i586: NEW unmet dependencies detected: apcupsd#3.14.10-alt2 /etc/sysconfig/apcupsdmessages Это из-за появления в одном из скриптов [ -f /etc/sysconfig/apcupsdmessages ] && . /etc/sysconfig/apcupsdmessages Вроде бы, оно с условием, зачем unmet ? Если что, /etc/sysconfig/apcupsdmessages положить в пакет, конечно, не проблема... -- С уважением, Сергей Афонин asy@altlinux.ru